2015
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asu074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing differential networks with applications to the detection of gene-gene interactions

Abstract: Summary Model organisms and human studies have led to increasing empirical evidence that interactions among genes contribute broadly to genetic variation of complex traits. In the presence of gene-by-gene interactions, the dimensionality of the feature space becomes extremely high relative to the sample size. This imposes a significant methodological challenge in identifying gene-by-gene interactions. In the present paper, through a Gaussian graphical model framework, we translate the problem of identifying ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
122
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall first define a standardized estimate W i,j for each individual entry of the precision matrix, which is the one-sample version of the estimates proposed in Xia et al (2015), then propose a novel test statistic S ℐ×𝒥 based on the sum of all possible Wi,j2, for ( i, j ) ∈ ℐ ×𝒥.…”
Section: Testing a Given Submatrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We shall first define a standardized estimate W i,j for each individual entry of the precision matrix, which is the one-sample version of the estimates proposed in Xia et al (2015), then propose a novel test statistic S ℐ×𝒥 based on the sum of all possible Wi,j2, for ( i, j ) ∈ ℐ ×𝒥.…”
Section: Testing a Given Submatrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Xia et al (2015), we first develop an estimator of ω i,j and then base the test on its bias corrected standardization. We begin by constructing estimators of r i,j .…”
Section: Testing a Given Submatrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations