2017
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.10560917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TESTING Corticosteroids in IgA Nephropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were some patients that showed benefit, however, the trial ended prematurely, which prevents us from extrapolating a definitive treatment benefit. Another recent trial studied the role of rituximab, showing that peripheral B cell counts decreased, however, there was no effect on under-glycosylated IgA1, immune complexes, nor severity of disease [12]. Although IgAN is less commonly seen in the Hispanic population, we must consider this diagnosis in a Hispanic patient presenting with acute renal failure, hematuria, and proteinuria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were some patients that showed benefit, however, the trial ended prematurely, which prevents us from extrapolating a definitive treatment benefit. Another recent trial studied the role of rituximab, showing that peripheral B cell counts decreased, however, there was no effect on under-glycosylated IgA1, immune complexes, nor severity of disease [12]. Although IgAN is less commonly seen in the Hispanic population, we must consider this diagnosis in a Hispanic patient presenting with acute renal failure, hematuria, and proteinuria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TESTING trial, which recruited the majority of patients from China, compared methylprednisolone (0.8 mg/kg/day; maximum 48 mg/day) against placebo, and demonstrated that a relatively high corticosteroid dose had potential renal benefit, with a reduction of patients in the methylprednisolone group reaching the primary composite renal outcome (40% decrease in eGFR, ESRD or death due to kidney failure; 5.9% vs 15.9% in the placebo group), and a reduced mean annual eGFR decline in this group (− 1.79 in the methylprednisolone group vs − 6.95 ml/min/1.73 m 2 in the placebo group). However, this came at a cost with a significantly increased rate of adverse events, and the study was terminated early by the data safety monitoring committee due to the increased number of life-threatening infections in the treatment arm [ 65 ]. Of interest, the rate of annual eGFR decline in the placebo arm of the TESTING study was much higher compared to the supportive care arm of the STOP-IgAN study (− 6.95 vs − 1.6 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ), supporting findings from a previous observational study that patients of East Asian origin may have more rapid rates of renal decline in IgAN [ 66 ], and therefore could conceivably respond differently to immunosuppressive therapy.…”
Section: Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current guidelines, patients with GFR > 50 ml/min/1.73 m 2 who fail to achieve levels of proteinuria below 1 g/day despite 3–6 months of optimized supportive care (including RAS blockers) are candidates for a 6-month course of systemic corticosteroid therapy [2]. The majority of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the claim that corticosteroids reduce proteinuria and the probable progression of kidney function decline, but at the same time are associated with a number of adverse effects [87].…”
Section: T Cells As a Therapeutic Target Of Traditional And Biologicamentioning
confidence: 99%