2007
DOI: 10.2175/193317707x256973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Corrective Action Strategies to Mitigate the Impact of Toxic Shock Events in Activated Sludge Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the increased hydraulic loading to the CA train caused incomplete nitrification resulting in nitrite accumulation (data not shown). The pilot plant-scale experiments with hypochlorite affirmed the conclusions made by the laboratory scale studies (Pinto et al 2007). …”
Section: Mitigating Hypochlorite Shockssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the increased hydraulic loading to the CA train caused incomplete nitrification resulting in nitrite accumulation (data not shown). The pilot plant-scale experiments with hypochlorite affirmed the conclusions made by the laboratory scale studies (Pinto et al 2007). …”
Section: Mitigating Hypochlorite Shockssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The CAPM's developed are a multi-tiered decision making tool that address (1) the nature of the contaminant, (2) the data available on process effects of the contaminant, (3) plant specific operational flexibility, and (4) instructions for process monitoring during and immediately after a toxic shock event. The complete CAPMs have been published in Water Practice (Pinto et al 2007). The two corrective actions tested in this study involve 1) chemically enhance primary treatment (CEPT) and 2) sludge diversion and storage.…”
Section: Corrective Action Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Providing the adaptation of bacterial population, the nitrification process has the ability to withstand shocks and is controlled with precise monitoring and more chemical use. However, in the case of more than 70 ppm ammonia, the process is uneconomical and impossible to control. In an experimental investigation, Sabbah et al studied the potential application of tuff as a matrix for ammonia removal in an intermittent flow biofilter in comparison with sand. They perceived from the research that the tuff filters possess superior performance in ammonia removal compared to sand filters, which is able to be justified because of better adsorption capacity of tuff for ammonia compared to sand because its specific surface area is 50 times higher than the specific surface area of the sand .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%