2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.02.21252685
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Black-White disparities in biological aging in older adults in the United States: analysis of DNA-methylation and blood-chemistry methods

Abstract: Biological aging is a proposed mechanism through which social determinants drive health disparities. We conducted proof-of-concept testing of eight DNA-methylation and blood-chemistry quantifications of biological aging as mediators of disparities in healthspan between Black and White participants in the United States Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n=8231). We quantified biological aging from four DNA-methylation "clocks" (Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge, and GrimAge), a DNA-methylation Pace of Aging (DunedinPoAm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the literature evaluating them is fragmented. Although all of these algorithms purport to measure aging, they have surprisingly low agreement 18,19 ; articles often report promising findings from one (or more) DNA methylation algorithms, but often in different samples, and many algorithms show inconsistent associations with outcomes. 11,[20][21][22][23] Important validation steps are now being taken to rigorously evaluate multiple DNA methylation algorithms in the same study (e.g., in the Health and Retirement Survey).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature evaluating them is fragmented. Although all of these algorithms purport to measure aging, they have surprisingly low agreement 18,19 ; articles often report promising findings from one (or more) DNA methylation algorithms, but often in different samples, and many algorithms show inconsistent associations with outcomes. 11,[20][21][22][23] Important validation steps are now being taken to rigorously evaluate multiple DNA methylation algorithms in the same study (e.g., in the Health and Retirement Survey).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, mortality differences across demographic groups mean that differences between Black and White participants, and between men and women, may be underestimated. Participation biases may compound this survival bias, especially for Black–White comparisons; Black participants in the VBS were younger and healthier than the full sample of Black participants in the HRS ( 46 ). Our estimates of Black–White disparities are, therefore, likely to be conservative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation biases may compound this survival bias, especially for Black-White comparisons; Black participants in the Venous Blood Study were younger and healthier than the full sample of Black participants in the HRS (41). Our estimates of Black-White disparities are therefore likely to be conservative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%