2014
DOI: 10.4172/2329-6755.1000145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Spatial Interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But despite a small difference, due to lower values of MAE and RMSE in neural networks method, this method was chosen as a better method. This result is consistent with that of Sitharam et al (2008) and Nevtipilova et al (2014). They also examined the superiority of ANNs over other methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But despite a small difference, due to lower values of MAE and RMSE in neural networks method, this method was chosen as a better method. This result is consistent with that of Sitharam et al (2008) and Nevtipilova et al (2014). They also examined the superiority of ANNs over other methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In another study, the capability of ANNs in spatial interpolation was evaluated and compared with conventional interpolation methods like Kriging and IDW. The results indicated that despite the high value of RMSE in the MLP method, this method can be used in spatial interpolation (Nevtipilova et al 2014). In an investigation Sitharam et al (2008) compared on geostatistics, neural network and support vector machine methods; the results illustrated a better performance of the ANN method over the other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDW, RFsp and RFSI had similar performance and were slightly worse than OK. Worse performance of IDW compared to OK in synthetic case studies was also found in Zimmerman et al [50], MacCormak et al [51], and Nevtipilova et al [52]. IDW, RFsp, and RFSI performed differently for different semivariogram nugget-to-sill ratios, ranges, and sample sizes (Figure 4).…”
Section: Rfsi Performancesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The neuralnet package uses supervised learning algorithms for training the network (Günther and Fritsch, 2010). The neuralnet package in the R program was used in many researches (Soni and Abdullahi, 2015;Dengel et al, 2013;Nevtipilova et al, 2014).…”
Section: Development Of Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%