2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2003)129:3(206)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and Modeling Two Rockfill Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three types of ballast, three types of rockfill materials giving a total of 23 independent sets of data were adopted (Varadarajan et al 2003;Chavez and Alonso 2003;Indraratna et al 1998Salim and Indraratna 2004;Suiker et al 2005;Anderson and Fair 2008;Aursudkij et al 2009). The parameters used for the model are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three types of ballast, three types of rockfill materials giving a total of 23 independent sets of data were adopted (Varadarajan et al 2003;Chavez and Alonso 2003;Indraratna et al 1998Salim and Indraratna 2004;Suiker et al 2005;Anderson and Fair 2008;Aursudkij et al 2009). The parameters used for the model are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical response of rockfill is largely dominated by particle breakage. The predictions of the stress-strain-volumetric behaviour for three rockfill materials (Varadarajan, et al 2003;Chavez and Alonso 2003) have been made by using the current model as shown in Figs. 13.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering impounding e ect, the inner friction decreases the angle coe cient of the material, which was imagined to be 20% regarding the technical literature [16,17]. Decreasing coe cient of Young's modulus was also imagined to be 50% with regard to the carried-out studies [18,19].…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is attributed to the increase amounts of particle crushing at higher normal stresses (Varadarajan, et al 11 , Lade et al 6 ). This can not be verified for the three materials investigated since the quantification of particle crushing was calculated for the complete samples CC1, CC2 and CB1 (for al the tests for the different normal loads) and not for each of the individual normal stresses.…”
Section: Stress-displacement Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%