2015
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1008697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and Modeling Dependencies Between a Network and Nodal Attributes

Abstract: Network analysis is often focused on characterizing the dependencies between network relations and node-level attributes. Potential relationships are typically explored by modeling the network as a function of the nodal attributes or by modeling the attributes as a function of the network. These methods require specification of the exact nature of the association between the network and attributes, reduce the network data to a small number of summary statistics, and are unable provide predictions simultaneousl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, they put forward a class of exponential-family random network models that logistically model the full network, including both the random connection and random attributes. Fosdick and Hoff (2015) further extend such work, focusing on latent variable models for jointly modeling dependencies between a network and nodal attributes. In their work, Fosdick and Hoff allow node-specific network factors to impact the modeling of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they put forward a class of exponential-family random network models that logistically model the full network, including both the random connection and random attributes. Fosdick and Hoff (2015) further extend such work, focusing on latent variable models for jointly modeling dependencies between a network and nodal attributes. In their work, Fosdick and Hoff allow node-specific network factors to impact the modeling of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al (2012) develop a prior over the array normal model in which the mode-specific covariance matrices are functions of a potentially infinite set of latent features. In a similar vein, Fosdick and Hoff (2012) develop a version of factor analysis based on the array normal model. The Tucker product has also been used to construct priors in applications where it is the parameters in the model that are arrays: Bhattacharya and Dunson (2012) use a Tucker product to develop a prior over probability distributions for multivariate categorical data, and Volfovsky and Hoff (2012) use a collection of connected array normal distributions as a prior over parameter arrays in ANOVA decompositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they do not break connections like dynamic NEM's [11,15].  Nodal Attribute Models (NAM): Unlike the previous two models, a NAM does not rely on network structure and creates connections based explicitly on the attributes of two given nodes [2,19,9]. This research belongs to the category of Dynamic Network Evolution Models.…”
Section: A Dynamic Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%