2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17668-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies

Abstract: Integrating results from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and gene expression studies through transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) has the potential to shed light on the causal molecular mechanisms underlying disease etiology. Here, we present a probabilistic Mendelian randomization (MR) method, PMR-Egger, for TWAS applications. PMR-Egger relies on a MR likelihood framework that unifies many existing TWAS and MR methods, accommodates multiple correlated instruments, tests the causal effect of gen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recently derived collaborative mixed model (CoMM) [ 20 , 21 ] likewise accounts for the uncertainty of eQTL effect size estimates from reference transcriptome data by jointly modeling reference and test data within a linear mixed-model framework. The PMR-Egger [ 22 ] and moPMR-Egger [ 23 ] also take the approach of jointly modeling reference and test data to address the uncertainty of eQTL effect size estimates from the reference data. However, these methods that are based on the maximum likelihood inference framework and implement likelihood ratio tests, are derived only for quantitative phenotypes and could suffer computation burden for testing thousands of cis-SNPs per gene, which often happens in practice particularly when considering imputed SNP data or whole-genome sequencing data for TWAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently derived collaborative mixed model (CoMM) [ 20 , 21 ] likewise accounts for the uncertainty of eQTL effect size estimates from reference transcriptome data by jointly modeling reference and test data within a linear mixed-model framework. The PMR-Egger [ 22 ] and moPMR-Egger [ 23 ] also take the approach of jointly modeling reference and test data to address the uncertainty of eQTL effect size estimates from the reference data. However, these methods that are based on the maximum likelihood inference framework and implement likelihood ratio tests, are derived only for quantitative phenotypes and could suffer computation burden for testing thousands of cis-SNPs per gene, which often happens in practice particularly when considering imputed SNP data or whole-genome sequencing data for TWAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) studies have illustrated that the information on expression regulation may play a pivotal role in disease development ( Albert and Kruglyak, 2015 ). Transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) is widely utilized in integrating GWAS with eQTL studies for investigating the causal genes associated with complex traits or diseases ( Gamazon et al, 2015 ; Gusev et al, 2016 ; Yuan et al, 2020 ). Therefore, TWAS analysis may help us to identify novel genes associated with IPF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where y and ε y are defined as in Equation (2); is the N × p genotype matrix for p cis-SNPs in the given gene; w m is the same SNP effects on gene expression as defined in Equation (7); the scalar represents the genetic effect of GReX (i.e., ) on y and can be interpreted as the causal effect of GReX on y (Yuan et al, 2019 ; Zhu and Zhou, 2020 ); and is the q -length vector of alternative genetic effects; note that is not the same genotype matrix as , and the q SNPs in are those who show direct horizontal effects on y , such as the trans-eQTLs and SNPs associated with alternative splicing events (Matlin et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methods Based On Tissue-specific Genetically Regulated Exprementioning
confidence: 99%