2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x13000163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing albendazole resistance in Fasciola hepatica: validation of an egg hatch test with isolates from South America and the United Kingdom

Abstract: The main goal of the current work was to develop and validate an in vitro fluke egg hatch test, as a method for the detection of albendazole (ABZ) resistance in the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Fluke eggs (200/ml, n= 5) from six different isolates were used in the current experimental work. They were obtained from different geographical locations and named Cullompton (UK), CEDIVE (Chascomus, Argentina), INTA-Bariloche (Bariloche, Argentina), Rubino (Uruguay), Cajamarca (Perú) and Río Chico (Catamarca, Argen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hepatica isolates to ABZ was assessed by in vitro FEHT. The principles of FEHT have been described elsewhere ( Alvarez et al., 2009 , Fairweather et al., 2012 , Canevari et al., 2014 ), although our protocol was somewhat modified as described below. Eggs were obtained from pooled faecal samples before treatment in both herds (farms A and B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…hepatica isolates to ABZ was assessed by in vitro FEHT. The principles of FEHT have been described elsewhere ( Alvarez et al., 2009 , Fairweather et al., 2012 , Canevari et al., 2014 ), although our protocol was somewhat modified as described below. Eggs were obtained from pooled faecal samples before treatment in both herds (farms A and B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatched and unhatched, including dead eggs and eggs with developed miracidia were counted under an inverted microscope at 40x magnification. Ovicidal activity of ABZ was calculated according to the formula, below: Ovicidal activity (%) = (% of eggs hatched in negative control - % eggs hatched after drug exposure/% of eggs hatched in negative control)*100 ( Alvarez et al., 2009 , Canevari et al., 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vitro egg hatch assays have been used to detect resistance to albendazole and triclabendazole. Albendazole appears to have an ovicidal effect on F. hepatica, and egg hatch assays appear to discriminate between resistant and susceptible isolates (Canevari et al., ; Novobilský, Amaya Solis, Skarin, & Höglund, ; Robles‐Pérez, Martínez‐Pérez, Rojo‐Vázquez, & Martínez‐Valladares, ). In contrast, only one preliminary study suggested that TCBZ had an ovicidal effect (Fairweather et al., ), others showed that an egg hatch assay was not able to detect resistance to TCBZ in the field (Robles‐Pérez, Martínez‐Pérez, Rojo‐Vázquez, & Martínez‐Valladares, ) and in our experience, the amount of DMSO required to solubilize TCBZ and its metabolites is too toxic, hence if the appropriate controls are included, the assay cannot discriminate between resistant and susceptible field isolates of F. hepatica (Hodgkinson and Williams, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Anthelmintic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although guidelines for diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance in F. hepatica are lacking, there is agreement in the literature that the faecal egg reduction test (FECRT) combined with other methods such coproantigen reduction ( Gordon et al., 2012b; Novobilský et al., 2012; Brockwell et al., 2013; Hanna et al., 2015 ), detection of fluke DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ( Robles-Pérez et al., 2013 ) and/or in vitro egg hatch test ( Alvarez et al., 2009; Fairweather et al., 2012; Canevari et al., 2014 ) provide reliable information about flukicide efficacy in naturally infected animals. Furthermore, post-treatment fluke histology ( Hanna et al., 2010 ) can show direct morphological damage in flukes, but is not applicable in common veterinary practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%