2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2015.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing against changing correlation

Abstract: A test for time-varying correlation is developed within the framework of a dynamic conditional score (DCS) model for both Gaussian and Student t-distributions. The test may be interpreted as a Lagrange multiplier test and modi…ed to allow for the estimation of models for time-varying volatility in the individual series. Unlike standard moment-based tests, the score-based test statistic includes information on the level of correlation under the null hypothesis and local power arguments indicate the bene…ts of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not matter whether they are real-valued, integer-valued, (0,1)-bounded or strictly positive, as long as there is a conditional density for which the score function and the Hessian are well-defined. The practical relevance of the GAS framework has been illustrated in the case of financial risk forecasting (see e.g., Harvey and Sucarrat (2014) for market risk, Oh and Patton (2013) for systematic risk, and Creal et al (2014) for credit risk analysis), dependence modelling (see e.g., Harvey and Thiele (2015) and Janus et al (2014)), and spatial econometrics (see e.g., Blasques et al (2014d) and Catania and Billé (2016)). For a more complete overview of the work on GAS models, we refer the reader to the GAS community page at http://www.gasmodel.com/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not matter whether they are real-valued, integer-valued, (0,1)-bounded or strictly positive, as long as there is a conditional density for which the score function and the Hessian are well-defined. The practical relevance of the GAS framework has been illustrated in the case of financial risk forecasting (see e.g., Harvey and Sucarrat (2014) for market risk, Oh and Patton (2013) for systematic risk, and Creal et al (2014) for credit risk analysis), dependence modelling (see e.g., Harvey and Thiele (2015) and Janus et al (2014)), and spatial econometrics (see e.g., Blasques et al (2014d) and Catania and Billé (2016)). For a more complete overview of the work on GAS models, we refer the reader to the GAS community page at http://www.gasmodel.com/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result u t is negative and so t+1jt falls unless x 1t and The scores may be computed under the null hypothesis of constant correlation tjt 1 = r; where r is the maximum likelihood estimator of ; and used in a portmanteau test. When r = 0; moment-based tests are obtained because u t = x 1t x 2t , but when r 6 = 0 the score-based tests can be much more powerful; see Harvey and Thiele (2016). The tests can be modi…ed for a bivariate t-distribution with estimated EGARCH models.…”
Section: Multivariate Scale and Dynamic Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, using the estimated parameters we recover the time series of of the scores s γ and s δ , which we use to carry out the tests. Specifically, following Harvey and Thiele (2016), which apply this methodology to test against the time variation of correlations, we employ three different test specifications: the Portmanteau test, Q, the Ljung-Box test, Q * , and the test. For all these test, the optimal lag-length is selected following the methodology of .…”
Section: A1 Score-based Tests For Time Varying Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%