2013
DOI: 10.1086/670593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Accuracy and Precision of Existing Photometry Algorithms on Moving Targets

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Previous studies determining which astronomical photometry software is best suited for a particular dataset are usually focused on speed, source classification, and/or meeting a sensitivity requirement. For faint objects in particular, the priority is given to maximizing signal-to-noise ratio. Photometry of moving targets offers additional challenges (1) to aperture photometry because background object contamination varies from image to image, and (2) to routines that build a PSF model from point sou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These are the photon noise within the aperture, the standard deviation of the pixels comprising the sky ring that are used to determine the background, and a term that accounts for the uncertainty in the background level. 32 Our derived error estimates were verified with and compared to the ones available in Ref. 33.…”
Section: Construction Of Polarimetric Pointssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These are the photon noise within the aperture, the standard deviation of the pixels comprising the sky ring that are used to determine the background, and a term that accounts for the uncertainty in the background level. 32 Our derived error estimates were verified with and compared to the ones available in Ref. 33.…”
Section: Construction Of Polarimetric Pointssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since SExtractor generally underestimates photometric errors (e.g., Sonnett et al 2013), we decided to manually set a minimum error of 0.05 magnitudes for all those detections with a photometric error less than that value. Indeed, it represents the minimum systematic error for HST imaging data.…”
Section: Hst Photometry Of the Hff Lyα Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correction is then applied to account for the flux excluded by that aperture based on a 2 dimensional Gaussian profile fit to the source. In this way, source elongation can be at least roughly accounted for, with the RMS uncertainty increasing by modest amounts -∼ 50% in the case discussed by Sonnett et al (2013a).…”
Section: Test Of the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, Sonnett et al (2013a) presented a comparison of the relative performances of various photometry techniques in the scenario of moderate SNR observations ( 20), of a Kuiper Belt Object, moving at 2.8 "/hr. At the expense of knowledge of the PSF and any aperture corrections, the telescope was tracked at a non-sidereal rate to produce a (nearly) untrailed image of the KBO, allowing circular apertures to be used, facilitating comparison of a wide range of photometry packages.…”
Section: Test Of the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%