Testing a Remote Sensing-Based Interactive System for Monitoring Grazed Conservation Lands

Ford, Lawrence D.; Butterfield, H. Scott; Hoorn, Pete A. Van; Allen, Kasey B.; Inlander, Ethan; Schloss, Carrie A.; Schuetzenmeister, Falk; Tsalyuk, Miriam

doi:10.1016/j.rala.2017.06.005

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With access to spatial boundaries of easements, remote sensing may be a powerful tool for monitoring conservation success. For example, the Nature Conservancy developed an interactive web tool that uses satellite remote sensing data to monitor compliance on grazed conservation lands, with highly impactful results (Ford et al, 2017). Remote sensing data ranges from free, public-access, moderateresolution data with widely-researched methods for analysis (for example, the Landsat series) to expensive, commercial data at very high resolutions capable of counting individual animal species on the ground (for example, Maxar's Earth observation satellites).…”

Section: Monitoring and Data Transparencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunities and gaps in conservation incentive programs on California agricultural land

Lenhardt,

Egoh

2023

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural incentive programs promote ecosystem health and biodiversity on California working lands and encourage a multitude of conservation goals. The various objectives, environmental impacts, and financial costs of conservation incentive programs are challenging to assess. The ecosystem services framework is a useful tool for identifying tradeoffs between conservation management options. Here, 52 active incentive programs were reviewed to determine the ecosystem services prioritized by each program in California. Next, the top 20 highest funded federal conservation practices were assessed in terms of their ecosystem service impacts. We found that there is a gap between California’s ecosystem services goals and the ecosystem services that are impacted by federal programs, and that the top funded practices are not necessarily the ones that deliver the best benefits in terms of ecosystem services. This study highlights the gaps between conservation goals and outcomes on California agricultural land, as well as the need for regional conservation monitoring to determine the impacts of incentive programs.

show abstract

Section: Monitoring and Data Transparencymentioning

confidence: 99%