2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4438-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a pyriproxyfen auto-dissemination station attractive to gravid Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto for the development of a novel attract-release -and-kill strategy for malaria vector control

Abstract: Background Larviciding is an effective supplementary tool for malaria vector control, but the identification and accessibility of aquatic habitats impedes application. Dissemination of the insect growth regulator, pyriproxyfen (PPF), by gravid Anopheles might constitute a novel application strategy. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of using an attractive bait-station to contaminate gravid Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto with PPF and subsequently transfer PPF to larval habitats. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial-temporal heterogeneity could affect the EI effect in autodissemination studies [16,31]. Suman et al evaluated the spatial-temporal efficacy of PPF autodissemination via dual-treatment autodissemination stations (container type) in the field, and the results showed that efficacy could be observed for 8-12 weeks (2-3 months), and PPF could be detected in sentinel cups up to 200 m from stations [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial-temporal heterogeneity could affect the EI effect in autodissemination studies [16,31]. Suman et al evaluated the spatial-temporal efficacy of PPF autodissemination via dual-treatment autodissemination stations (container type) in the field, and the results showed that efficacy could be observed for 8-12 weeks (2-3 months), and PPF could be detected in sentinel cups up to 200 m from stations [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study conducted in north-east Tanzania (Schorkopf et al 2016), a mixture of attractants (acetoxy hexadecanolide) and biological larvicides (Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus) was shown to synergize the control of mosquito disease vectors. A similar study was conducted recently in Kenya, where mosquitoes were lured by the oviposition attractant cedrol to bait stations and contaminated by an insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen, after which they transferred it to breeding sites and thereby contaminated larvae (Mbare et al 2019). All these findings demonstrate the potential of infochemicals to be used in surveillance and control of mosquito vectors.…”
Section: The Role Of Oviposition-stimulating Infochemicals In Mosquito Controlsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…From this study and others [ 7 , 41 , 42 ], it is obvious that trap type and placement with respect to ground level is critical for ensuring the optimal efficacy of odour-based lures for malaria vectors. Previous evaluations of gravid traps targeting gravid Anopheles mosquitoes have identified the presence of water in, the direction of airflow into (up- or down-draft) and the placement of the trap with respect to ground level to be important factors when capturing these females [ 7 , 9 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…From this study and others [ 7 , 41 , 42 ], it is obvious that trap type and placement with respect to ground level is critical for ensuring the optimal efficacy of odour-based lures for malaria vectors. Previous evaluations of gravid traps targeting gravid Anopheles mosquitoes have identified the presence of water in, the direction of airflow into (up- or down-draft) and the placement of the trap with respect to ground level to be important factors when capturing these females [ 7 , 9 , 41 , 42 ]. In addition, trap type has been identified as a critical factor when capturing host-seeking Anopheles mosquitoes, with various versions of the BG-Sentinel traps, including the BG-Malaria trap and the Suna trap, often demonstrated to be superior compared to other trap types, e.g., the CDC light trap [ 33 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%