2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a maintenance model for eating disorders in a sample seeking treatment at a tertiary care center: a structural equation modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This last finding supports our hypothesis and suggests that the added hypothesized maintenance variables in the CB model improved its explanatory utility. The direct path from interpersonal problems to the other three maintaining factors, and the results regarding how each maintenance factor is inter-related with each other, as well as their associations with OSW, all are in accordance with previous findings across individuals with different DSM-IV ED diagnosis, included individuals with threshold and sub-threshold AN [15], and together provide support for the trans-diagnostic nature of the maintenance factors as they pertain to OSW [7,12,13,23]. The finding indicating that clinical perfectionism, interpersonal problems, and core low self-esteem impacted dietary restraint through OSW, highlights the importance of dysfunctional cognitions amongst bulimic-type ED patients and are consistent with CB-E theory and past research [8, 13, 17-20, 48, 51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This last finding supports our hypothesis and suggests that the added hypothesized maintenance variables in the CB model improved its explanatory utility. The direct path from interpersonal problems to the other three maintaining factors, and the results regarding how each maintenance factor is inter-related with each other, as well as their associations with OSW, all are in accordance with previous findings across individuals with different DSM-IV ED diagnosis, included individuals with threshold and sub-threshold AN [15], and together provide support for the trans-diagnostic nature of the maintenance factors as they pertain to OSW [7,12,13,23]. The finding indicating that clinical perfectionism, interpersonal problems, and core low self-esteem impacted dietary restraint through OSW, highlights the importance of dysfunctional cognitions amongst bulimic-type ED patients and are consistent with CB-E theory and past research [8, 13, 17-20, 48, 51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Apart from body image concerns, the preliminary evidence that all diagnostic groups report comparable scores in all measures used to assess the four maintaining factors (incorporated in the CB-E model) supports the suggestion that intrapersonal problems, core low self-esteem, clinical perfectionism, and mood intolerance are related to all bulimic-type EDs without differences at the diagnostic level [13,15,17,36]. On the other hand, differences between BED and the other bulimic-type ED diagnostic groups were also observed ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they revealed that: (a) SAAS discriminated community younger and older adolescent girls and boys with elevated and nonelevated (global) scores on the EAT-26 [55] (Study 1); (b) adolescent with EDs endorse higher scores on SAA latent factor than those from the community (Study 3), and; (c) the ED diagnostic groups did not differ in terms of SAAS levels. 13 The latter finding is important given increasing efforts to identify underlying aetiological and maintenance processes of eating pathology regardless of specific diagnostic categorisation, and the efforts to develop common psychological assessment and interventions [4,[71][72][73]. Further research needs to concentrate on specific eating-disordered behaviours as well as diagnostic categories and subtypes among both adolescent and adult ED cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%