2001
DOI: 10.2172/965672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Summary Report INEEL Sodium-Bearing Waste Vitrification Demonstration RSM-01-1

Abstract: SummaryOver several decades, site operations at what is now the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory have included nuclear reactor testing, reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel, and the storage, treatment, and disposal of the resultant radioactive and mixed wastes generated. Liquid, acidic, and radioactive high-level waste (HLW) and sodium bearing waste (SBW) from spent-fuel reprocessing operations have for the most part been calcined in the New Waste Calcin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since only a small fraction of the sulfur fed to the melter was found in the molten salt after the test, the remaining sulfur was likely partitioned to the off gas, but escaped analyses. Details of this test are described by Goles et al (2001), with highlights discussed in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since only a small fraction of the sulfur fed to the melter was found in the molten salt after the test, the remaining sulfur was likely partitioned to the off gas, but escaped analyses. Details of this test are described by Goles et al (2001), with highlights discussed in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since only a small fraction of the sulfur fed to the melter was found in the molten salt after the test, the remaining sulfur was likely partitioned to the off gas, but escaped analyses. Details of this test are described by Goles et al (2001), with highlights discussed in Section 3.2.iv A third melter test (EV-16-2001-1) was performed using the EV-16 melter at Clemson University. The target glass composition used in this test was the same as that fabricated during the first two segments of the RSM-01-1 test-30 mass% waste loading (on a dry, non-volatile oxide basis), SBW-9 additive mix (see Section 1.0).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of sulfur segregation during waste-glass melting have been performed in support of waste vitrification activities (for examples, see Perez et al 1983;Bates et al 1985;Fu et al 1996;Li et al 1996;Vienna et al 1999;Pegg et al 2000;Musick et al 2000;Darab et al 2001;Li et al 2001;Goles et al 2001;Muller et al 2001;Peeler et al 2001;Goles et al 2002;Vienna et al 2003;Hrma et al 2003;and Hrma et al 2004). The following subsections review a portion of that literature thought to be key to the understanding of sulfate-incorporation limits during Hanford LAW vitrification.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WM-180 is the one waste composition that has been characterized and a simulant waste prepared for vitrification tests through pilot scale. 2,8 Actual WM-180 waste has been vitrified in crucibles, as well. 9 Since a single worst case recipe will be prepared, this will give a perspective of how much deviation from WM-180 occurs.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in order to detect and measure it in the glass during the RSM-01-1 test at PNNL, 8 cesium in WM-180 simulant was increased a factor of 209 over that of the actual waste concentration 2 to 1.65 10 -3 M. This was required to result in 0.05 wt% Cs 2 O in the glass (calculated at 25% waste oxide loading) that could be measured. 10 Secondly, when both are present at concentrations typical of commercial HLLW, technetium can potentially affect (increase) volatility of cesium (and cesium can decrease the volatility of technetium) by forming cesium pertechnetate.…”
Section: Special Considerations For Off-gas Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%