2011
DOI: 10.1177/0734282911408707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Review: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WAIS-IV (Wechsler 2008a) is a reliable measure of intellectual abilities, with large representative normative data and extensive research indicating its high levels of validity and reliability to assess cognitive ability in individuals aged 16–90 (Climie and Rostad 2011). The WAIS-IV has 15 subtests, 10 of which are ‘core’ and were completed in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WAIS-IV (Wechsler 2008a) is a reliable measure of intellectual abilities, with large representative normative data and extensive research indicating its high levels of validity and reliability to assess cognitive ability in individuals aged 16–90 (Climie and Rostad 2011). The WAIS-IV has 15 subtests, 10 of which are ‘core’ and were completed in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clock drawing test assesses visuospatial function [23]. Trail-making tests A and B, Color-Word interference test, and Verbal fluency (FAS) were used to test executive function [24]. The Color-Word interference test is divided into 4 items: color naming, color reading, inhibition and inhibition/switching, testing mental flexibility, mental speed, and inhibition.…”
Section: Assessment Of Cognitive and Emotional Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WAIS-IV takes into consideration current concepts of fluid reasoning, WM, and PS from the Cattell–Horn–Carroll model and contains 15 subtests, five of which are supplemental (Bowden, Saklofske, & Weiss, 2011a; Kaufman, Salthouse, Scheiber, & Chen, 2016). For each subtest, it is assumed that items are administrated in ascending order of difficulty; consequently, the start points, reversal rules, basal rules, and discontinue rules are used to reduce the administration time and estimate participants’ sum scores without having to apply all the test items (Climie & Rostad, 2011; Weiss, Saklofske, Coalson, & Raiford, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%