2009
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test–Retest Variability of Microperimetry Using the Nidek MP1 in Patients with Macular Disease

Abstract: Test-retest variability was lowest for MS and highest for PWS. However, MS does not provide spatial information. The authors recommend the use of CMS and PMS for monitoring macular function and consider a change of greater than 2.56 and 2.31 dB (the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of their coefficients of repeatability), respectively, to exceed test-retest variability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
103
5
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
103
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Using the same MP-1 unit at all visits, we recorded a 2.2 dB decrease in mean MS at 5 to 6 years after RD surgery, as compared with results at 18-month check. As test-retest variability of MS in patients with macular disease does not exceed 2 dB, 23 other factors, including patients' concentration during testing session should have had a role in MS decrease, especially in patient 4 with high myopia and a 9.5 dB reduction at the final visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Using the same MP-1 unit at all visits, we recorded a 2.2 dB decrease in mean MS at 5 to 6 years after RD surgery, as compared with results at 18-month check. As test-retest variability of MS in patients with macular disease does not exceed 2 dB, 23 other factors, including patients' concentration during testing session should have had a role in MS decrease, especially in patient 4 with high myopia and a 9.5 dB reduction at the final visit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intersession test-retest variability of different microperimetric parameters with SLO perimetry and MP-1 Nidek microperimetry, such as average threshold, fixation stability, and macular integrity, within different populations has been reported recently [2,4,[7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As shown in earlier studies, automatic fundus perimetry and the first microperimetry that uses a true eye-tracking system (MP1) allow accurate, repeatable, and topographically specific examination of retinal sensitivity [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations