Test-Retest Reliability of the Thai Migraine Disability Assessment (Thai-MIDAS) Questionnaire in Thai Migraine Patients

Vongvaivanich, Kiratikorn; Yongprawat, Thitaree; Jindawong, Nucharin; Chansakul, Chakorn

doi:10.31524/bkkmedj.2018.02.003

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There have been 9 non-English versions of the MIDAS questionnaire, with Italian [ 31 ], Japanese [ 32 ], Turkish [ 33 , 34 ], Taiwanese [ 35 ], Thai [ 27 , 28 ], Arabic [ 36 ], Greek [ 37 ], German [ 38 ], and Spanish [ 39 ] versions that have been previously reported ( Table 7 ). The development process for a non-English version from an original English version questionnaire included forward and backward translation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A Thai version was tested for criterion validity with 13-week diary data with correlation coefficients of 0.32–0.74 for 5 individual questions, the number of headache days and pain severity and test–retest reliability with ICC of 0.58–0.82 for the 5 individual questions and of 0.76 for the MIDAS total score in 93 people with migraine for validity test and 30 for test–retest reliability at a headache clinic conducted between October 2010 and September 2011 [ 27 ], the study time straddling the release of the new guidelines in 2011. The other Thai version was assessed for test–retest reliability with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.36 to 0.94 and for internal consistency with an ICC of 0.95 [ 28 ]. Among all of the non-English versions, 6 versions were tested for validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Thailand, the Thai-version MSQ 2.1 has been used to assess QoL of people with migraine [ 26 ], but a translation of a questionnaire specific for assessing migraine-related disability has not been available. Two Thai versions of the MIDAS questionnaire have been published, one in 2013, and the other in 2018 [ 27 , 28 ]. The first Thai questionnaire was only tested for content equivalence to the original English version by professional translators and medical specialists, but was not tested for language equivalence.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, the questionnaire was not tested for internal consistency. The other Thai questionairre was only tested for test–retest reliability and internal consistency [ 28 ]. The present study fills the gaps in knowledge mentioned above and was primarily aimed at testing for concurrent validity and test–retest reliability, and secondarily at testing for internal consistency of the Thai-version MIDAS Questionnaire, and as a pilot study, for factors predictive of disability including duration of migraine history, migraine characteristics, and comorbidities for migraine-related disability as assessed by the Thai-version MIDAS Questionnaire.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: concurrent validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundA Thai-version of the Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ 2.1) is available, but a qualified questionnaire used specifically for disability assessment was not available. The most relevant practical disability assessment tested during this study was the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire.ObjectivesTo test the concurrent validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency of a Thai-version MIDAS questionnaire, and factors to predict disability in people with migraine.MethodsWe conducted the present prospective study at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Bangkok. The original English MIDAS Questionnaire was translated into Thai with back-translation into English and the language equivalence was assessed. The Thai-version MIDAS Questionnaire was tested for concurrent validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency, and factors including duration of migraine history, migraine characteristics, and comorbidity were assessed for the ability to predict migraine-related disability of migraineurs.ResultsOf the 58 participants, 31 were eligible to be included. The validity of the Thai-version questionnaire between the MIDAS total score and the mean headache severity (question B), the mean pain duration per attack, and the mean pain numerical rating scale (NRS) score were moderately correlated with a Spearman correlation coefficient range 0.42–0.58. The test–retest reliability of MIDAS grade had a weighted κ of 0.66, and for individual questions of the MIDAS total score, questions A and B assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients ranged 0.89–0.98. The internal consistency had a Cronbach α of 0.98. The mean pain NRS score in the past 3 months was an independent predictive factor for migraine-related disability.ConclusionThe Thai-version MIDAS Questionnaire has moderate concurrent validity, acceptable internal consistency, and excellent test–retest reliability. It would be helpful to assess clinical outcomes. Future study with a standardized translation process for the Thai-version questionnaire and a larger sample size is warranted to confirm internal consistency and determine all probable predictive factors for migraine-related disability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: concurrent validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All patients met the migraine diagnosis according to the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3 beta) ( Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), 2013 ). Migraine disability scores were assessed by a neurologist using a migraine disability questionnaire: Migraine Disability Assessment Score Thai Version (Thai-MIDAS), developed by Vongvaivanich et al (2018) . Patients were interviewed about the type of migraine (with or without aura), the pattern of aura, duration of migraine history, the number of attacks per month (in the previous three months), antimigraine medication, impact of headaches on daily life, and pain severity scores.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Migraine eye: correlation between migraine and the retina

Udomwech,

Sulastiwaty,

Siriarchawawat

2024

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Activation of the trigeminal vascular system in migraine releases vasoactive neurotransmitters, causing abnormal vasoconstriction, which may affect the ocular system, leading to retinal damage. The purpose of our study was to determine whether there are differences in each retinal layer between migraine patients and healthy subjects. Methods A case-control study recruited 38 migraine patients and 38 age- and sex-matched controls. Optical coherence tomography was used to measure the thickness of the peripapillary and macular retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL and mRNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and inner nuclear layer (INL). Results The mean ages of the migraine patients and controls were 36.29 ± 9.45 and 36.45 ± 9.27 years, respectively. Thirty-four patients (89.48%) in both groups were female. The mean disability score was 19.63 ± 20.44 (indicating severe disability). The superior-outer INL of migraine patients were thicker than controls. Thickness of the GCL at temporal-outer sector and mRNFL at the superior-outer sector of the headache-side eyes was reduced. However, the INL of the headache-side-eye showed negative correlation with the disability score. This is the first study having found thinning of the GCL and mRNFL of the headache-side eyes. The INL was also thickened in migraines but showed negative correlation with the disability score. Conclusions Increased INL thickness in migraine patients may result from inflammation. The more severe cases with a high disability score might suffered progressive retinal neuronal loss, resulting in thinner INL than less severe cases.

show abstract

Test-Retest Reliability of the Thai Migraine Disability Assessment (Thai-MIDAS) Questionnaire in Thai Migraine Patients

Cited by 2 publications

References 12 publications

Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: concurrent validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability

Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: concurrent validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability

Migraine eye: correlation between migraine and the retina

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About