Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-Retest Reliability of the Dual-Microphone Voice Range Profile

Abstract: The intra-examiner variation of the dual-microphone VRP is well below the differences seen after surgical or logopedic intervention, even when measuring in non-sound-treated rooms. There is a need for studies regarding inter-examiner reliability with a longer interval between test and retest before the assessment is fully reliable for clinical application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the software used in computer-assisted phoniatric examination cannot be disregarded, as is clear from the significant differences of simultaneously recorded measurement data from both programs processing identical signals. In spite of these differences, our findings endorse the literature results which prove high reliability and reproducibility of VRP measurements, and thus clinical usefulness [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The influence of the software used in computer-assisted phoniatric examination cannot be disregarded, as is clear from the significant differences of simultaneously recorded measurement data from both programs processing identical signals. In spite of these differences, our findings endorse the literature results which prove high reliability and reproducibility of VRP measurements, and thus clinical usefulness [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The dual‐microphone phonetogram system Voice Profiler 5.0 (Alphatron Medical Systems, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) was used for assessing the voice range profile 37 . The parameters of interest were the minimum and maximum fundamental frequencies ( f 0 ), measured in semitones (ST); the frequency range; the minimum and maximum voice intensity, defined as sound pressure level (SPL), measured in decibels (dB); and the intensity range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the intra-examiner variation of the assessment when using the multi-vowel approach is below the clinically relevant differences. 36 The sample sizes met the requirements of the a priori power calculation, and thereby reduced the risk of type II errors. Overall, the study has high external validity and results are applicable on other patient populations with LIN and/or NNL, before and after TLM-cordectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voice range profiles Complete voice range profiles (VRP) using the Voice Profiler Ò equipment replaced recordings of frequency ranges and softest intensities. The VRP assessment is clinically reliable 36 and recordings using this equipment can be conducted in standard quiet office surroundings. We measured frequency and intensity measures (minimum, maximum, and ranges) and VRP area as the dependent variables (Figure 1).…”
Section: Data Collection Voice Assessment Procedure and Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%