2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability of task-based and resting-state blood oxygen level dependence and cerebral blood flow measures

Abstract: Despite their wide-spread use, only limited information is available on the comparative test-retest reliability of task-based functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging measures of blood oxygen level dependence (tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using arterial spin labeling. This information is critical to designing properly powered longitudinal studies. Here we comprehensively quantified and compared the test-retest reliability and reproducibility performance of 8 commonly applie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the presurgical mapping where it is sufficient enough to localize a function, any application in psychiatry, for instance, needs to focus on the strength of activations. Accordingly, there exists no routinely used clinical application of fMRI outside of the field of presurgical mapping due to the lack of sufficient reliability in the measurement of individual activation strength-for example task, instruction, and different levels of attention may influence reliability (45,46). Group studies, by contrast, show a much higher reliability in detecting deviations in activation strength (47).…”
Section: Current Clinical Applications Of Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the presurgical mapping where it is sufficient enough to localize a function, any application in psychiatry, for instance, needs to focus on the strength of activations. Accordingly, there exists no routinely used clinical application of fMRI outside of the field of presurgical mapping due to the lack of sufficient reliability in the measurement of individual activation strength-for example task, instruction, and different levels of attention may influence reliability (45,46). Group studies, by contrast, show a much higher reliability in detecting deviations in activation strength (47).…”
Section: Current Clinical Applications Of Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From resting-state data, it is possible to identify neuronal networks that show in their spatial organization a striking similarity with those networks that have been identified through task-related fMRI (54). These networks are often identifiable also on single subject levels, but depends on the method that is used for extracting the information (46). Since this discovery, there has been a tremendously interest in restingstate fMRI and the examination of the related intrinsic-brain networks and their dynamics (17,(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62).…”
Section: Is Resting-state Fmri the Solution?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we note that studies of short-term reliability of reward activation yield stronger estimates when the contrast included a neutral comparison. Several studies have reported a moderate-to-good short-term (days or weeks) reliability of activation of the ventral striatum (ICC = 0.5 -0.8) when examining the anticipation of monetary gain relative to a neutral condition where neither gain or loss was possible (Holiga et al, 2018;Plichta et al, 2012;Schlagenhauf et al, 2008). The neutral condition used in these studies differs from the neutral condition in the present study, a no-change outcome (for the PMCP sample only), which might be interpreted as a positive or negative outcome, depending on whether the trial involved not-losing or notwinning, respectively.…”
Section: Contrasts Of Active Conditions Are Less Stablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that the overall spatial activity patterns (i.e. the relative within-subject activation of one region over another) of both tbfMRI and rsfMRI measures provide much more reliable marker as compared to standard voxel-and region-wise analyses Holiga et al, 2018). Making use of this higher reliability may therefore represent a viable way of improving the replicability of fMRI applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%