2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00737-015-0536-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability of retrospective self-reported maternal exposure to childhood abuse and neglect

Abstract: Retrospective reports of exposure to childhood trauma indicate it is common. There is growing interest in relationships between maternal exposure to childhood adversity, perinatal mental health, and pregnancy outcomes. The goal of this study was to describe the self-reported prevalence and test-retest reliability of exposure to childhood maltreatment using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire among adult women around the time of pregnancy. A substantial proportion of women reported exposure to maltreatment and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a study evaluating test-retest reliability of the CTQ in pregnant women (before and after delivery) found at least moderate agreement for every subscale except physical neglect. 61 This suggests that compared to other trauma types, physical neglect may be more prone to selective recall. Further, a study comparing prospective and retrospective measures of CM found that retrospective measures may underestimate the association of CM with objective adult health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a study evaluating test-retest reliability of the CTQ in pregnant women (before and after delivery) found at least moderate agreement for every subscale except physical neglect. 61 This suggests that compared to other trauma types, physical neglect may be more prone to selective recall. Further, a study comparing prospective and retrospective measures of CM found that retrospective measures may underestimate the association of CM with objective adult health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional design limits inferences on temporality of relations observed. Additionally, the data may have been subject to recall bias; however, retrospective reports of exposure to violence in women around the time of pregnancy have demonstrated moderate reliability (Cammack et al 2016). Further, data on other dimensions of IPV (e.g., sexual abuse) were not collected; thus, the prevalence of IPV reported in the current study may be an underestimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Notably, women were not aware of the hypotheses being tested when answering the IPT survey and standardized measures as used here which query discrete objective events (e.g., punched, kicked, choked) rather than global perceptions (e.g., were you abused as a child) have good reliability when asked proximate to pregnancy. (64) Moreover, women more typically underreport such events which would drive findings toward the null. While we found a significant relationship between maternal IPT and increased smoking in these pregnant women and that prenatal smoking was more prevalent among women who go on to have a child develop asthma (Table 1), we did not find that smoking in pregnancy mediated the relationship between IPT and children’s asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%