2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold as test stimuli for evaluation of conditioned pain modulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study revealed the highest CPM responder rate (inhibitors) using PPT as the test stimulus. Further, Kovacevic et al ( 2021 ) reported higher ICC for the CPM effect assessed with PPT compared with heat pain thresholds. These two studies endorse the usage of PPT as the test stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study revealed the highest CPM responder rate (inhibitors) using PPT as the test stimulus. Further, Kovacevic et al ( 2021 ) reported higher ICC for the CPM effect assessed with PPT compared with heat pain thresholds. These two studies endorse the usage of PPT as the test stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further, Kovacevic et al (2021) reported higher ICC for the CPM effect assessed with PPT compared with heat pain thresholds. These two studies endorse the usage of PPT as the test stimulus.…”
Section: Severe Neuropathic Pain Relates To Impaired Endogenous Pain ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Further, the assessments of pressure pain sensitivity may be more reliable than the assessment of heat pain sensitivity as the deeper tissues detected by PPT and PPTo may play an important role in many musculoskeletal pain conditions ( 33 ). One study reported a large variation in the statistical methods used when discussing the test-retest variability of the thermal threshold ( 43 , 44 ). Conversely, good reproducibility of the mechanical thresholds has been reported ( 45 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PPT was evaluated using a quantitative sensory testing protocol [28] with a handheld pressure algometer (Baseline Dolorimeter, Fabrication Enterprises, USA) equipped with a 1 cm 2 metal probe. Pressure was applied at a rate of 0.5 kg/s over the right side of the two muscle groups: the extensor carpus radialis (PPT arm) and peroneus longus (PPT leg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%