2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test–retest reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the submental muscle group during volitional swallowing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may exaggerate, or mask, the effects induced by rehabilitative interventions. On this note, investigations assessing the reliability of MEPs in measuring excitability of corticobulbar and corticospinal motor projections suggest that averaging multiple trials minimizes the effect of intrinsic variability and improves the reliability of mean MEP measurement [20,23,24]. This is in agreement with the absent effect of time on mean MEP measures documented in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may exaggerate, or mask, the effects induced by rehabilitative interventions. On this note, investigations assessing the reliability of MEPs in measuring excitability of corticobulbar and corticospinal motor projections suggest that averaging multiple trials minimizes the effect of intrinsic variability and improves the reliability of mean MEP measurement [20,23,24]. This is in agreement with the absent effect of time on mean MEP measures documented in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The procedures followed in this study have been reported to allow reliable measurement of corticobulbar excitability during pharyngeal swallowing within and across sessions [20]. Subjects were seated in a comfortable chair.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since only 4 out of 15 subjects could have intensity below 100% maximal output at 1.8 RMT (above the maximal output of the machine), MEP amplitudes at this intensity were not included in the further comparison. According to a previous report [33][35], a mean of five recorded MEPs resulted in good-to-high reliability in amplitude measures when a single hotspot technique was applied; five MEPs were therefore recorded at each stimulus intensity to avoid general fatigue in the participants. Subjects were allowed to rest between trials in order to avoid muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundreds of studies in neurologic populations such as stroke and spinal cord injury attribute time-varying change in TMS metrics to physiologic mechanisms underlying disease and recovery (Stinear et al, 2007; Trompetto et al, 2000; Liepert et al, 2000; Wittenberg et al, 2003). However, to ensure that TMS can indeed serve as a clinical tool to track longitudinal processes, it is first critical to understand test-retest reliability of its metrics in healthy individuals (Malcolm et al, 2006; Pourtney and Watkins, 2000; Christie et al, 2007; Doeltgen et al, 2009; De Vet et al, 2006; Mills and Nithi 1997; Kimiskidis et al 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%