2011
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.00783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test/Retest Reliability of Maximum Mouth Pressure Measurements With the MicroRPM in Healthy Volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
71
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(34 reference statements)
5
71
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A flanged mouthpiece was used as recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS), because it ensures the least air leakage at the mouthpiece [13]. This method was used, since the portability of the manometer is advantageous for clinical use and its reliability has been assessed [14]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flanged mouthpiece was used as recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS), because it ensures the least air leakage at the mouthpiece [13]. This method was used, since the portability of the manometer is advantageous for clinical use and its reliability has been assessed [14]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 This device has been shown to have excellent reliability in measuring MIP in non-ventilated participants (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.83-0.90). 21 Raw MIP scores were normalised using the method described by Evans and Whitelaw 22 and have been presented as percentage of predicted values to account for known variation of MIP with age and gender. Inspiratory muscle fatigue was measured using the fatigue resistance index (FRI) technique described by Chang and colleagues, 3 based on the maximum incremental threshold loading test described in the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines.…”
Section: Primary Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 This suggests that at least one previous testing session is necessary to achieve more accurate values. Baseline data showed marked variability between participants in the pulmonary and swallowing function variables (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%