Test-retest reliability of electrophysiological parameters related to cognitive motor control

Fallgatter, Andreas J.; Bartsch, Andreas J.; Strik, Werner; Mueller, Thomas; S, Eisenack; Neuhauser, B.; Aranda, Derlis; Herrmann, Martin J.

doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00505-8

Cited by 51 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar results (rs4.6) have been reported by Larson et al (2010) and Segalowitz et al (2010). Relatedly, the oddball P3 waveform, an ERP thought to index similar processes as b r a i n r e s e a r c h 1 5 1 6 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 6 6 -7 5 the LPP, shows comparable reliability to those reported here (4.6; Fallgatter et al, 2001;Sandman and Patterson, 2000;Segalowitz and Barnes, 1993;Walhovd and Fjell, 2002;Williams et al, 2005; however, it should be noted that these studies largely focused on test-retest reliability) and can be quantified with as few as 20 trials (Cohen and Polich, 1997). Finally, Davidson and colleagues (Larson et al, 2000(Larson et al, , 2005Lee et al, 2009) have demonstrated moderate reliability (4.5) for EMG activity and startle modulation recorded during emotion processing and regulation.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…These studies have repor ted moderate-to-high reliability for the oddball P3 (Fallgatter et al, 2001;Sandman and Patterson, 2000;Segalowitz and Barnes, 1993;Walhovd and Fjell, 2002;Williams et al, 2005), emotion-modulated electro-myographic (EMG) activity (Larson et al, 2000(Larson et al, , 2005Lee et al, 2009), the error-related negativity (ERN; Olvet and Hajcak, 2009b;Larson et al, 2010;Segalowitz et al, 2010) and several other stimulus-locked ERPs (i.e. the P2, N2 and P3; Hämmerer et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The psychometric properties of the late positive potential during emotion processing and regulation

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The psychometric properties of the late positive potential during emotion processing and regulation

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…179, 180, 181, 182 Two recent meta-analyses suggest that genetic effect sizes at the level of brain activity may be considerable. 183, 184 There is ample evidence for dysfunction and subtle structural brain anomalies in ADHD.…”

Section: Molecular Genetic Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The genetics of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults, a review

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adult form of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (aADHD) has a prevalence of up to 5% and is the most severe long-term outcome of this common neurodevelopmental disorder. Family studies in clinical samples suggest an increased familial liability for aADHD compared with childhood ADHD (cADHD), whereas twin studies based on self-rated symptoms in adult population samples show moderate heritability estimates of 30–40%. However, using multiple sources of information, the heritability of clinically diagnosed aADHD and cADHD is very similar. Results of candidate gene as well as genome-wide molecular genetic studies in aADHD samples implicate some of the same genes involved in ADHD in children, although in some cases different alleles and different genes may be responsible for adult versus childhood ADHD. Linkage studies have been successful in identifying loci for aADHD and led to the identification of LPHN3 and CDH13 as novel genes associated with ADHD across the lifespan. In addition, studies of rare genetic variants have identified probable causative mutations for aADHD. Use of endophenotypes based on neuropsychology and neuroimaging, as well as next-generation genome analysis and improved statistical and bioinformatic analysis methods hold the promise of identifying additional genetic variants involved in disease etiology. Large, international collaborations have paved the way for well-powered studies. Progress in identifying aADHD risk genes may provide us with tools for the prediction of disease progression in the clinic and better treatment, and ultimately may help to prevent persistence of ADHD into adulthood.

show abstract

“…It is important to note that there is no contradiction between developmental changes and developmental stability of individual differences because the latter refers to the preservation of relative rank-ordering of individuals over age despite age-related changes in absolute values. However, this stability is not perfect and test-retest coefficients are lower than those obtained in adults using a 30-min retest (Fallgatter et al, 2001). Although this difference can be partially attributed to the difference in retest interval, there is another potential source of variability, namely, individual differences in the rate of developmental changes (see 4.6 below).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Heritability of brain activity related to response inhibition: A longitudinal genetic study in adolescent twins

Anokhin

Golosheykin

Grant

et al. 2017

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to inhibit prepotent but context- or goal-inappropriate responses is essential for adaptive self-regulation of behavior. Deficits in response inhibition, a key component of impulsivity, have been implicated as a core dysfunction in a range of neuropsychiatric disorders such as ADHD and addictions. Identification of genetically transmitted variation in the neural underpinnings of response inhibition can help to elucidate etiological pathways to these disorders and establish the links between genes, brain, and behavior. However, little is known about genetic influences on the neural mechanisms of response inhibition during adolescence, a developmental period characterized by weak self-regulation of behavior. Here we investigated heritability of ERPs elicited in a Go/No-Go task in a large sample of adolescent twins assessed longitudinally at ages 12, 14, and 16. Genetic analyses showed significant heritability of inhibition-related frontal N2 and P3 components at all three ages, with 50 to 60% of inter-individual variability being attributable to genetic factors. These genetic influences included both common genetic factors active at different ages and novel genetic influences emerging during development. Finally, individual differences in the rate of developmental changes from age 12 to age 16 were significantly influenced by genetic factors. In conclusion, the present study provides the first evidence for genetic influences on neural correlates of response inhibition during adolescence and suggests that ERPs elicited in the Go/No-Go task can serve as intermediate neurophysiological phenotypes (endophenotypes) for the study of disinhibition and impulse control disorders.

show abstract

Test-retest reliability of electrophysiological parameters related to cognitive motor control

Cited by 51 publications

References 22 publications

The psychometric properties of the late positive potential during emotion processing and regulation

The psychometric properties of the late positive potential during emotion processing and regulation

The genetics of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults, a review

Heritability of brain activity related to response inhibition: A longitudinal genetic study in adolescent twins

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About