2015
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.1003589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test–retest reliability of a new device for assessing ankle joint threshold to detect passive movement in healthy adults

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a new device for assessing ankle joint kinesthesia. This device could measure the passive motion threshold of four ankle joint movements, namely plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion and eversion. A total of 21 healthy adults, including 13 males and 8 females, participated in the study. Each participant completed two sessions on two separate days with 1-week interval. The sessions were administered by the same experimenter in the same laboratory. At… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues around inter-rater reliability is commonly reported in measures of sensory testing [14] so these data are encouraging. For example, the reliability of knee position sense tests has been shown to vary substantially [45] whilst tests of ankle joint position sense (JPS) using motorised equipment [46,47] report reliability values comparable to those in our study. Intra-rater reliability data from the GradDT™ and StepDT™ also compare favourably with the proprioception subtests of traditional, clinical measures [14,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Issues around inter-rater reliability is commonly reported in measures of sensory testing [14] so these data are encouraging. For example, the reliability of knee position sense tests has been shown to vary substantially [45] whilst tests of ankle joint position sense (JPS) using motorised equipment [46,47] report reliability values comparable to those in our study. Intra-rater reliability data from the GradDT™ and StepDT™ also compare favourably with the proprioception subtests of traditional, clinical measures [14,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2 A), which showed good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.74–0.94). 30 The proprioception test device collected the minimum angular motion that the patient is able to detect during knee flexion/extension and ankle dorsal/plantarflexion. The device consists of a box and a platform that can rotate within the frontal and sagittal planes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the ankle proprioception test, the knee and hip joints were flexed at 90°, and the leg was perpendicular to the surface of the platform when the platform was placed in a horizontal position. 30 During the knee proprioception test, the lateral axis of the instrumentation was parallel to the mediolateral axis of the knee joint. The hip and knee joints were each positioned at 90°, and the ankle joint was in a neutral position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The passive kinesthesia threshold of the ankle joint was assessed by using an ankle proprioception tester (KP-11, Toshimi, Shandong, China). The test-retest reliability of this instrument was verified with an intraclass correlation coefficient in range of 0.737-0.935 [28]. Each participant sat on an adjustable seat, and their hip, knee, and ankle joints were fixed at 90 • .…”
Section: Passive Ankle Kinesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%