Test-Retest Correlations for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

Joesting, Joan

doi:10.2466/pr0.1977.40.2.671

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The low test-retest reliability in the Sanxiety scale confirms the nature of the S-anxiety. The similar results were reproduced by Joesting (1977), and Nixon and Steffeck (1977). Joesting (1977) found that test-retest reliability, obtained by administering the STAI before and after a class examination, was lower in the Sanxiety (.66) than the T-anxiety scale (.83).…”

Section: Anxietysupporting

confidence: 61%

“…The similar results were reproduced by Joesting (1977), and Nixon and Steffeck (1977). Joesting (1977) found that test-retest reliability, obtained by administering the STAI before and after a class examination, was lower in the Sanxiety (.66) than the T-anxiety scale (.83). Also, Nixon and Steffeck (1977) confirmed lower test-retest reliability of the S-anxiety scale over 3, 8, and 11-month period in college student sample.…”

Section: Anxietysupporting

confidence: 61%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maladaptive Cognitive Schemas As Mediators Between Perfectionism and Psychological Distress

Lee¹

2005

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Anxietysupporting

confidence: 61%

Section: Anxietysupporting

confidence: 61%

Maladaptive Cognitive Schemas As Mediators Between Perfectionism and Psychological Distress

Lee¹

2005

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Satisfactory evidence of concurrent validity of the STAI-T scale and construct validity of the STAI-S scale was reported (Spielberger, 1970). Highly acceptable test-retest reliability coefficients have been reported for the STAI-T scale but not for the STAI-S scale as were anticipated, because a valid measure of STAI-S should reflect the influence of unique situational factors existing at the time of testing (Joesting, 1977;Newmark, 1972;Spielberger, 1970). The standard scoring procedure was followed and the two distinct subscales were to be used separately in the main analysis for this study.…”

Section: The Personal Autonomy Inventory (Pal)mentioning

confidence: 76%

Functional Hemispheric Asymmetry and Impaired vs. Optimal Psychological Functioning: Evaluation of a Model

Wissing

Sander

1993

South African Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to propose and evaluate a model in which differential relationships are hypothesized between the nature and degree of functional hemispheric asymmetry (FHA), or neuropsychological differentiation on the one hand, and optimal or healthy personality functioning (OPF) vs. impaired personality functioning (IPF), on the other. FHA is operationalized by means of indices of the degree of left-hemisphere specialization for processing verbal information and the degree of right-hemisphere specialization for the recognition of emotional facial expressions. The degree of optimal personality functioning is operationalized with indices of self-actualization and autonomy, and the degree of impaired personality functioning with indices of the degree of anxiety and depression. The model was evaluated with the aid of the RAMONA program for path analysis with latent variables. The hypothesized model fits the data relatively well. A complex pattern of relationships emerged, in which specific qualities of FHA are associated with healthy vs. impaired personality functioning. From a systems perspective functional differentiation as well as functional integration seem to be important processes to consider when relationships between aspects of personality functioning and neuropsychological processes are investigated.Die doel van hierdie ondersoek was om 'n model te formuleer en te evalueer waarin diffarensisle verbande gehipotetiseer word tussen die aard en mate van funksionele hemisferiese asimmetrie (FHA) of neuropsigologiese differensiasie enersyds, en optimale of gesonde persoonlikheidsfunksionering (OPF) vs. geremde persoonlikheidsfunksionering (GPF) andersyds. FHA is geoperasionaliseer met behulp van indekse van die mate van linker-hemisfeerspesialisering vir die prosessering van verbale informasie en van die mate van regter-hemisfeerspesialisering vir die herkenning van emosionele gesigsuitdrukkings. Die mate van OPF is geoperasionaliseer met indekse van selfaktualisering en outonomie, en die mate van GPF met indekse van die mate van angs en depressie. Die model is geevalueer met behulp van die RAMONA-program vir roeteontleding met latente veranderlikes. Die gehipotetiseerde model pas die data relatief goed. 'n Komplekse patroon van verbande is ge'identifiseer, waarin bepaalde kwaliteite van FHA saamhang met gesonde vs. ongesonde persoonlikheidsfunksionering. Uit 'n sisteemperspektief blyk dit dat funksionele differensiasie sowel as funksionele integrasie belangrike prosesse is wat in ag geneem moet word wanneer verbande tussen aspekte van persoonlikheidsfunksionering en neuropsigologiese prosesse ondersoek word.

show abstract

“…In a study by Joesting (1977), 105 educational psychology students were tested with the STAI and retested after a 45-minute class. The correlation reported for the A-state measure was .66, while the correlation for the A-trait was .81.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of a measure of computer anxiety

Maurer

Simonson²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Test-Retest Correlations for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

Abstract: For 100 to 105 students who were tested before and after a 45-min. classroom examination, test-retest correlations ranged from .66 (first and second administrations of A-State of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) to .83 (second administration of A-Trait and second administration of A-State).

Cited by 7 publications

References 2 publications

Maladaptive Cognitive Schemas As Mediators Between Perfectionism and Psychological Distress

Maladaptive Cognitive Schemas As Mediators Between Perfectionism and Psychological Distress

Functional Hemispheric Asymmetry and Impaired vs. Optimal Psychological Functioning: Evaluation of a Model

Development and validation of a measure of computer anxiety

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About