1992
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/7.6.523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest comparability and control subject data for the rey-auditory verbal learning test and rey-osterrieth/taylor complex figures

Abstract: This report presents data from a nonpatient sample considering the test-retest reliability and task comparability of the Rey-Osterrieth/Taylor Complex Figures and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. These tasks were presented to normal comparison subjects as a component of a large Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on anticonvulsant effects in a manner typical of routine clinical use. The results suggest a high degree of reliability for the Rey-Auditory Verbal Learning Test, supporting its use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Small but significant practice effects have been documented for some of the tests used, including the WAIS-III, 32,33 the WCST 34 and the RAVLT. [35][36][37][38] We believe that practice effects are the most likely cause of the apparent improvements in performance in some of the domains that we observed. If the study had included a control group that did not receive chemotherapy, or if more than one baseline assessment had been performed, the presence of practice effects might have been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Small but significant practice effects have been documented for some of the tests used, including the WAIS-III, 32,33 the WCST 34 and the RAVLT. [35][36][37][38] We believe that practice effects are the most likely cause of the apparent improvements in performance in some of the domains that we observed. If the study had included a control group that did not receive chemotherapy, or if more than one baseline assessment had been performed, the presence of practice effects might have been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Factor analysis has confirmed that Trial 1 of the RAVLT has the strongest load on the auditory attention factor in neurological patients 21. The RAVLT has good reliability and validity 22. No individual set of norms with an adequate sample size covering the age range of this study could be found.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…During the initial memory clinic screen participants were given List A; therefore, in this study they were presented with List B to decrease practice effects (Delaney, Prevey, Cramer, & Mattson, 1992; Lemay, Bédard, Rouleau, & Tremblay, 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%