2015
DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test-retest Agreement and Reliability of Quantitative Sensory Testing 1 Year After Breast Cancer Surgery

Abstract: The QST protocol reliability allows for group-to-group comparison of sensory function, but less so for individual follow-up after breast cancer surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The details and reliability of the QST protocol has been described elsewhere. Sensory dysfunction was in this manuscript defined as any sensory abnormality when compared to the contra lateral side or surrounding skin, in any of the measured modalities and specified further where necessary using IASP definitions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details and reliability of the QST protocol has been described elsewhere. Sensory dysfunction was in this manuscript defined as any sensory abnormality when compared to the contra lateral side or surrounding skin, in any of the measured modalities and specified further where necessary using IASP definitions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study participants were identified from a cohort of patients that had filled out questionnaires concerning pain after breast cancer surgery from previous studies . Inclusion criteria were women aged ≥ 18 years that had had breast cancer surgery, had pain in the breast > 6 months after surgery with a pain score ≥ 4 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) on a daily basis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standardized protocol was used for QST and consisted of sensory mapping, warmth detection thresholds (WDT), cool detection thresholds (CDT), heat pain thresholds (HPT), suprathreshold heat pain response (STH), and pressure pain thresholds (PPT). Sensory mapping delineated areas of hypo/hyperesthesia or allodynia using a brush, warm metal roller (40°C) and cool metal roller (25°C) (Somedic AB), which were run over the skin in the breast, axilla, arm, anterior, and lateral and posterior chest wall.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although QST allows for group-to-group comparison of sensory function, the use of QST to evaluate individual cases is limited [59]. Studies currently in progress are exploring the applicability of a simplified version for QST that might be applicable to individual clinical cases.…”
Section: Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%