1999
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1999.10485636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Regions Using Two or More Correlated Product Characteristics

Abstract: For inspection of manufactured parts, one can use the information of two or more product characteristics that are strongly related to the characteristic of interest. Under the condition that at most a given, typically very small, fraction of the accepted parts does not satisfy the specification limit, test regions are determined such that the number of accepted products is maximized. The methods are illustrated by Monte Carlo results and a numerical example from semiconductor industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies of Healy, Kim, Chou, Albers, and Albers are perhaps most closely related to the focus of our work, as these studies also focus on calculating optimal guardbands or tolerance limits. However, these studies differ from ours in 2 major aspects: First, these articles have a slightly different focus than our study: While Kim specifically consider economic aspects concerned with the inspection procedure, Albers and Albers tackle the calculation of guardbands for a certain characteristic of a device that may be difficult or costly to measure. They do so by investigating how the measurements of a physical parameter can be bypassed by using the measurements of another parameter that is less costly to measure and is highly correlated with the parameter of interest.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The studies of Healy, Kim, Chou, Albers, and Albers are perhaps most closely related to the focus of our work, as these studies also focus on calculating optimal guardbands or tolerance limits. However, these studies differ from ours in 2 major aspects: First, these articles have a slightly different focus than our study: While Kim specifically consider economic aspects concerned with the inspection procedure, Albers and Albers tackle the calculation of guardbands for a certain characteristic of a device that may be difficult or costly to measure. They do so by investigating how the measurements of a physical parameter can be bypassed by using the measurements of another parameter that is less costly to measure and is highly correlated with the parameter of interest.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In production contexts, there is typically a need to verify that a particular item or a product stream or lot of items meets performance/conformance goals of the producer and/or a consumer. Where one admits that individual conformance assessments are subject to uncertainty (possibly, as in Albers, Arts, and Kallenberg [1], because only indirect measurement of primary performance characteristics is possible or desirable) or only some of all items of interest will be inspected, statistical methods become useful. Traditionally, this was evident in the prominent place of methods of acceptance sampling in the engineering statistics literature.…”
Section: Statistics and (Sampling) Inspection And Acceptance Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the difference in yield and consumer risk between T * and T also is o( l σ l ). Besides the fact that the test limits are more simple, another advantage of using the test region T instead of T , is that the test limit in T for the l th linear combination is similar to the test limit that occurs in Albers, Arts and Kallenberg (1998b), where one considers the inspection of one characteristic, by means of a linear combination of measurements of two or more correlated characteristics. Using the test region T instead of T , enables us to use these results on inspection of one characteristic, in case parameters are unknown.…”
Section: Optimal Test Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%