2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Protocol for In-situ Bicycle Wheel Dynamic Comfort Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if road tests are the most direct method for measuring bicycle comfort, some researchers highlighted that the repeatability of results is sometimes poor, owing to variations in rider posture, bicycle speed, and road conditions [7]. Consequently, some laboratories developed indoor testing equipment, based on shakers [8,9] that mimic road excitations, to systematically analyse the relative contribution of bicycle components to the vibrations transmitted to the cyclists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if road tests are the most direct method for measuring bicycle comfort, some researchers highlighted that the repeatability of results is sometimes poor, owing to variations in rider posture, bicycle speed, and road conditions [7]. Consequently, some laboratories developed indoor testing equipment, based on shakers [8,9] that mimic road excitations, to systematically analyse the relative contribution of bicycle components to the vibrations transmitted to the cyclists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies related to the transmission of vibration by a road bicycle and road bicycle dynamic comfort have been reported in the literature. Test protocols and test rigs that mimic the road excitation in a laboratory were developed [4][5][6][7], and a wide range of transducers have been embedded within the bicycle in areas such as the brake hoods, stem, handlebars and seatpost to measure transmitted acceleration, force, power and energy to the cyclist [8][9][10][11]. The assessment of the bicycle and bicycle components' vibration transmissibility has been carried out [4,6,11], while psychophysics approaches have been used to assess cyclists' vibration perceptual thresholds, suggesting that there is a large variability among cyclists in their capacity to differentiate sensory inputs at the hands [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study aims to quantify the effectiveness of cycling gloves and handlebar tape in reducing the vibration transmitted to the cyclist. The reduction of transmitted vibration was measured in terms of transmitted power and transmitted energy at the cyclist's hands since these two mechanical quantities are emerging as preferred metrics for bicycle dynamic comfort assessment [5,7,[10][11][12][13]. A shock-type excitation (i.e., impacts) was used in this study since it was thought to have a more severe negative effect on the cyclist than that of random-type excitation (i.e., excitation related to road surface roughness).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research relative to comfort in road cycling hypothesized that the higher the level of bicycle’s vibration, the lower the level of comfort. 14,15 Applying accelerometers in specific part of the frame and wheels has resulted as an increase in the vibrations induced to the bike by increasing speed or tire pressure. 14 Also the employment of different wheels has been demonstrated to influence the amount of vibrations induced to the bike and thus the level of comfort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Also the employment of different wheels has been demonstrated to influence the amount of vibrations induced to the bike and thus the level of comfort. 15 Hölzel et al 16 concentrated on different road surfaces showing how they influenced the level of vibrations and the rolling resistance, parameters linked to the level of comfort. However, in neither of these studies, the amount of vibrations was correlated with the level of comfort perceived by the cyclist, measured with numeric scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%