Abstract:The article introduces a learning-oriented approach to test preparation that could help in easing the tension between learning and assessment. The first part of the article discusses the different concepts that are usually used in the context of test preparation. The second section reports on the literature pertaining to the effects of test preparation on teaching, learning, and test performance. The article also attempts to differentiate between appropriate and unhealthy practices and show the intricate diffe… Show more
“…Specifically, the result that both the use of strategy by the TG and their reading test scores significantly increased confirms the positive association between the use of testtaking strategies and language test performance as reported by Huang (2016), Phakiti (2003), and Zhang et al (2014). This specific finding further strengthens Gebril's (2018) contention that test-taking strategies can effectively help language learners gain better scores in tests. More importantly, both levels of the TG statistically significantly improved their reading performance and outperformed their counterparts in the CG.…”
This study investigated the effect of teaching test-taking strategies to EFL student readers with different levels of reading proficiency (i.e. high and low). Two groups of undergraduate non-English majors joined an eight-week experiment. One served as the treatment group (TG) which learned test-taking strategies to tackle English reading test tasks, while the control group (CG) received no strategy instruction. The pretest and posttest reading performances of all the participants from the TG and CG were quantitatively compared. Additionally, the TG's use of test-taking strategies was investigated by means of entry and exit surveys. The results show that the students at both proficiency levels of the TG made significantly greater gains in the reading posttest compared with the pretest, and they also significantly outperformed their counterparts from the CG on the posttest. The participants from both levels of the TG also used significantly more test-taking strategies than before, but they used some strategies more frequently than others. Taken together, the results support the pedagogical effects of the instruction in test-taking strategies in EFL reading classes.
“…Specifically, the result that both the use of strategy by the TG and their reading test scores significantly increased confirms the positive association between the use of testtaking strategies and language test performance as reported by Huang (2016), Phakiti (2003), and Zhang et al (2014). This specific finding further strengthens Gebril's (2018) contention that test-taking strategies can effectively help language learners gain better scores in tests. More importantly, both levels of the TG statistically significantly improved their reading performance and outperformed their counterparts in the CG.…”
This study investigated the effect of teaching test-taking strategies to EFL student readers with different levels of reading proficiency (i.e. high and low). Two groups of undergraduate non-English majors joined an eight-week experiment. One served as the treatment group (TG) which learned test-taking strategies to tackle English reading test tasks, while the control group (CG) received no strategy instruction. The pretest and posttest reading performances of all the participants from the TG and CG were quantitatively compared. Additionally, the TG's use of test-taking strategies was investigated by means of entry and exit surveys. The results show that the students at both proficiency levels of the TG made significantly greater gains in the reading posttest compared with the pretest, and they also significantly outperformed their counterparts from the CG on the posttest. The participants from both levels of the TG also used significantly more test-taking strategies than before, but they used some strategies more frequently than others. Taken together, the results support the pedagogical effects of the instruction in test-taking strategies in EFL reading classes.
“…Test-taking strategies can assist test takers with overcoming the challenges they face in test situations. Gebril (2018) noted that giving test takers appropriate test-taking strategies can enhance their test performance. Based on this distinction, this study will investigate the metacognitive strategies students use when taking a reading test at the B2 test.…”
Section: Comprehension Processes and Strategies For Reading Textsmentioning
Language students apply different strategies to learn a second language (L2), especially when they want to attain proficiency in reading. The aim of the present study was to revisit the validity of the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI-R) among Saudi students using a new statistical method of confirmatory composite analysis (CCA). Past studies modeled MARSI-R as a common factor and applied confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test its validity. However, studies struggled to provide support for the validity of the MASRI-R with each suggesting different model. Instead, we treat the inventory as a composite, meaning that the items in MARSI-R form and define the inventory and not the other way around. We use partial least squared structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to allow the composite model to be estimated. The results indicated that the constructs of MARSI-R are better operationalized as composites not common factors as supported through CCA exclusively. After confirming the nature of the inventory, we evaluated the extent to which MARSI-R is related to reading proficiency through the mediational mechanism of motivational intensity (i.e., learning effort). Descriptive statistics illustrated that problem-solving strategies are the most used strategy and that females used the strategies more frequently than their male counterparts. Most importantly, the structural model showed that metacognitive reading strategies only exert an indirect effect on reading proficiency, suggesting that the effect of strategies is mediated by motivational intensity (i.e., learning effort). Thus, motivational intensity seems to be mediator in the relationship between metacognitive reading strategies and reading proficiency. Finally, methodological and educational implications are provided.
“…states that learning and study strategies are test preparation activities that affect test scores. It is her belief that test preparation activities intend to provide test-takers with information of a particular field in which they will be tested [ 24 ]. uses the term Test Preparation as “associated with activities inside and outside classes that help students be ready for exams.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.