2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of turbulence models for heat transfer within a ventilated cavity with and without an internal heat source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that for the studied case, the curves of turbulent kinetic energy and velocity along the cavity have almost the same variation for all the turbulent models with small difference between each model, where the rate of change between k-ε and other models does not exceed 3 %. However, since the computational time of k-ε model is much less than that of other models which is pointed out in the study of Piña-Ortiz et al (2018). Also, the k-ε model is selected for the further analysis.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that for the studied case, the curves of turbulent kinetic energy and velocity along the cavity have almost the same variation for all the turbulent models with small difference between each model, where the rate of change between k-ε and other models does not exceed 3 %. However, since the computational time of k-ε model is much less than that of other models which is pointed out in the study of Piña-Ortiz et al (2018). Also, the k-ε model is selected for the further analysis.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from A realizable k-ε turbulent model will be used since it is known to have a good performance with indoor airflows, temperature and pressure in closed structures. [41][42][43][44][45] In the turbulence model, the enhanced wall treatment with pressure gradient effects and thermal effects, and the full buoyancy effect under gravity have been taken into account, but the viscous heating is ignored since the air flows in the living room at a low speed and there is almost no mechanical energy be converted into heat.…”
Section: Computational Model and Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a study of the natural convection phenomena inside a wall solar chimney, Bacharoudis et al [39] proved that the realizable k−ε model was likely to provide superior performance for flows boundary layers under strong adverse pressure gradients. Piña-Ortiz et al [40,41] proved that the Realizable k−ε model was the best model for natural convection in a cubic cavity with the lowest temperature difference. Therefore, the Realizable k−ε model is selected for the current study.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%