2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02431-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of the auricular surface sex estimation method in fetuses and non-adults under 5 years old from the Lisbon and Granada Reference Collections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age at death was estimated through dental development and eruption (AlQahtani et al, 2010), fusion of cranial and postcranial bones (Cunningham et al, 2016), and the length of the long bones (Cardoso et al, 2014). The biological sex estimation was based on mandibular morphology (Schutkowski, 1993) and morphological and metric analyses of the auricular surface (Luna et al, 2017(Luna et al, , 2021Monge Calleja et al, 2020). The ages of enamel hypoplasia formation were obtained following Thomas et al (2019) and Reid and Dean (2000).…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age at death was estimated through dental development and eruption (AlQahtani et al, 2010), fusion of cranial and postcranial bones (Cunningham et al, 2016), and the length of the long bones (Cardoso et al, 2014). The biological sex estimation was based on mandibular morphology (Schutkowski, 1993) and morphological and metric analyses of the auricular surface (Luna et al, 2017(Luna et al, , 2021Monge Calleja et al, 2020). The ages of enamel hypoplasia formation were obtained following Thomas et al (2019) and Reid and Dean (2000).…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens since some techniques have been developed from regionally diverse, non-contemporary, and in part even non-identified skeletal samples, which limits their application to contemporary remains and remains that are temporally and spatially different from the methods' reference samples [17]. Secular trends have been identified for several features of the biological profile [18][19][20]. Nevertheless, non-contemporary collections also remain important, as they can contribute to human variation understanding, and many of them include samples with well-documented traumatic, pathological, and taphonomical changes [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%