1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01437763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of electron screening and vacuum polarization in heavy muonic atoms

Abstract: Energies of higher # X-rays have been measured in l~ natHg and 2~ to test the vacuum polarization correction and the electron screening effect in heavy muonic atoms. For tests of the energy calibration delayed nuclear 7-rays from the #-capture reaction were used. The experimental data agree to better than 4% with self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations of the electron screening. Transitions which are sensitive to the vacuum polarization correction mainly, verify the calculations to better than 1.5 %. Compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, experiments in the 1970s found a discrepancy between theoretical and measured values for certain transitions in heavy muonic atoms [3,4]. This motivated much research, and after a few years improvements in the theory [5][6][7][8] and in experiments [9,10] resolved the discrepancy and improved our understanding of QED [11]. Today a very similar situation can be found in the 'proton-radius' problem [15], wherein the root-mean-squared charge radius inferred from the leading nuclear contributions to atomic energy shifts in Hydrogen and muonic Hydrogen appears to depend on the flavour of the orbiting lepton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, experiments in the 1970s found a discrepancy between theoretical and measured values for certain transitions in heavy muonic atoms [3,4]. This motivated much research, and after a few years improvements in the theory [5][6][7][8] and in experiments [9,10] resolved the discrepancy and improved our understanding of QED [11]. Today a very similar situation can be found in the 'proton-radius' problem [15], wherein the root-mean-squared charge radius inferred from the leading nuclear contributions to atomic energy shifts in Hydrogen and muonic Hydrogen appears to depend on the flavour of the orbiting lepton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No deviation of such transition energies from calculation has ever been measured. On the contrary, Vuilleumier et al [13] have demonstrated that the calculations coincide with experiment for all transitions between 100keV and 400keV in the case of Rh, Hg, and T1. The muonic X-rays used as calibration standards are listed in The energies given for the #-Ba and /~-Pb lines are those of the strongest component of the fine-structure multiplet.…”
Section: The Muonic Linesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Due to the radial distribution of the electrons about 85 % of the screening originates from the two I s electrons as compared with the total screening of all 81 electrons in Pb. An analysis has shown that in reality nearly always full inner shells [11,[14][15][16] have to be assumed when the muon transition occurs. This is well understood since the mean lifetime of an l s vacancy in Pb is of the order of 10-17s, due to the refilling of np electrons [17], whereas the radiative muon transition time for the 5-4 and 6-5 transition is at least slower by a factor of 5 and 10, respectively [18].…”
Section: Inclusion Of the Electron State-dependent Screening And Discmentioning
confidence: 99%