2009
DOI: 10.1117/1.3094060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test of a non-local excess phase delay operator for GPS radio occultation data assimilation

Abstract: A physically-sound, non-local excess phase delay observation operator is developed for simulating excess phase delay measurements from GPS radio occultation (RO) missions. By approximating an observed ray by a straight line, the refractivity gradient information along an observed ray path is included in the simulated excess phase delay. This observation operator is used to simulate observations from the German CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) RO mission based on large-scale analysis. The need to use s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Another paper, (Shao et al 2009), to some extend similar to ours, with large number of observations (1158 RO events) but, simulate the signal in the 2D vertical plane only in the straight lines around the local tangent points, reports that there is up to 5% difference in relative difference between observed and ray-traced signal. These two results show similar performance to our solution (see, e.g., Figure 4).…”
Section: Excess Phase Data Validationsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. Another paper, (Shao et al 2009), to some extend similar to ours, with large number of observations (1158 RO events) but, simulate the signal in the 2D vertical plane only in the straight lines around the local tangent points, reports that there is up to 5% difference in relative difference between observed and ray-traced signal. These two results show similar performance to our solution (see, e.g., Figure 4).…”
Section: Excess Phase Data Validationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The most significant relative differences appear above the 20 km height level. In the paper by Shao et al (2009), the differences between GPS RO data and simulated data reach a standard deviation of 1-3 refraction units at heights below 14 km altitude. That can be considered as a 1-2% difference which is similar to our differences between COSMIC-1-based solutions and observations from atmPhs files at heights below 14 km.…”
Section: Excess Phase Data Validationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a consequence, the distance of the propagation path changes due to the bending of the signal, which leads to a difference between the phase delay of the actual received signal by the LEO satellite and the phase delay in the case of straight-line propagation. Such delay is defined as Excess Phase Delay, also known as EPD [4]. If the electron content in the signal propagation path is high, the phase velocity of signal propagation will be greater than its propagation velocity in vacuum, resulting in a possible negative EPD value; otherwise, the EPD value will be positive [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since RO observations are highly accurate, have a high vertical resolution, long‐term stability, and all‐weather capability (Kursinski et al ., 1997), and can be assimilated without bias correction, they are a complement to microwave and infrared measurements. Positive influences of assimilating RO observations on numerical weather prediction have been well studied (Healy, 2008; 2013; Shao et al ., 2009; Cucurull, 2010; Bauer et al ., 2014). In many operational assimilation schemes, observations are weighted proportionally to the inverse of their error variances (Shao and Zou, 2002; Li et al ., 2009), which means that overestimating the observation error will decrease the impact on the result of data assimilation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%