2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02841996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test methods for fine aggregate angularity considering resistance of rutting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentages of Va, and VMA were found to decrease with the increase of EAFS percentage (Figures 8 and 9). It is believed that the reason for this is that EAFS form more angular in shape and the effect of aggregate interlock may increase the internal friction within the asphalt, which increase Gmm with the increase of EAFS (e.g., Topal and Sengoz, 2006;Park and Lee, 2002). In contrast, Figure 10 shows that the VFA increased with the increase of EAFS percentage.…”
Section: Componentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The percentages of Va, and VMA were found to decrease with the increase of EAFS percentage (Figures 8 and 9). It is believed that the reason for this is that EAFS form more angular in shape and the effect of aggregate interlock may increase the internal friction within the asphalt, which increase Gmm with the increase of EAFS (e.g., Topal and Sengoz, 2006;Park and Lee, 2002). In contrast, Figure 10 shows that the VFA increased with the increase of EAFS percentage.…”
Section: Componentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The angle of internal friction (φ) is an indication of particle interlocking and, hence, particle shape and surface texture (14). Fernandes and Gouveia (15) confirmed that a higher internal friction angle of fine aggregate indicates a better interlocking mechanism and results in a more resistant granular structure.…”
Section: Direct Shear Testmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Angularity of the fine aggregates was measured by using the Superpave FAA test and direct shear test (14).…”
Section: Angularity Of the Fine Aggregatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having the manufactured sand mix proportions to be reproduced exactly to the proportions specified in Table 21, the values for friction angle, void ratio and dry unit weight were assumed to be the same as for the once obtained for scaled limestone aggregate. The justification to such conclusion can be argued from a friction angle point of view, where the research preformed on manufactured sand had confirmed the friction angle to be 45.2 degrees (Park and Lee, 2002). Therefore, the manufactured sand material was deemed to be suitable as a substitute for scaled limestone aggregate and use in scaled aggregate pier application.…”
Section: Pier Composition Materialsmentioning
confidence: 97%