2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test mass capture for drag-free satellite based on RBF neural network adaptive sliding mode control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Stability Proof for Closed-Loop Systems Theorem 1: For the single-input single-output strictly feedback nonlinear system with time delay, under the action of the virtual control signals ( 17), (27), the actual control law (37) and the adaptive law of the ELM neural networks ( 18), ( 28) and (38), by choosing appropriate design parameters, all the states of entire closed-loop system are uniform ultimate boundedness (UUB). Meanwhile, the compensated tracking errors and weights of the system remain in a compact set Ω.…”
Section: Adaptive Elm Control Methods Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Stability Proof for Closed-Loop Systems Theorem 1: For the single-input single-output strictly feedback nonlinear system with time delay, under the action of the virtual control signals ( 17), (27), the actual control law (37) and the adaptive law of the ELM neural networks ( 18), ( 28) and (38), by choosing appropriate design parameters, all the states of entire closed-loop system are uniform ultimate boundedness (UUB). Meanwhile, the compensated tracking errors and weights of the system remain in a compact set Ω.…”
Section: Adaptive Elm Control Methods Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the previous methods employ prior knowledge to determine [25]. With the aim of obtaining a stable adaptive nonlinear parameter update law, not only a nonlinear parameterized neural network model should be constructed by adjusting the mean and variance of each receptive field basis function, but also a Taylor's series expansion should be adopted to convert the nonlinear model into partial linear form [26,27]. In this case, the application of inaccurate centers and widths usually lead to the degradation of approximation performance, which hinders the actual implementation of realtime control system design [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative motion of spacecraft and space inertial sensor’s test mass in the IBF frame have been modeled by [ 26 ] as follows: where , , , where and denote the position vector and the velocity vector of the test mass in IBF frame, respectively. and denote the attitude angle and the attitude angular velocity of test mass in IBF frame, respectively.…”
Section: System Dynamics Modeling With Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attitude and position standard errors of the spacecraft are 1 and 1 , respectively. The attitude and position standard errors of test mass are 200 and 1.7 , respectively [ 38 ]. The communication delay s. In this paper, simulations are validated using thrusts of 100 and 100 mN, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%