Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4262-5_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Bed for Quantitative NDE — Inversion Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subscript, h, is used here (instead of "e" for electronic noise) in order to create a distinction between the electronic noise associated with the measurement system response, n^(w), and the electronic noise associated with the flaw signal, ng(w (Addison et al 1982, CohenTenoudji et al 1984, Clark et al 1985b, Clark et al 1986, Koo 1988). …”
Section: Ill-posednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subscript, h, is used here (instead of "e" for electronic noise) in order to create a distinction between the electronic noise associated with the measurement system response, n^(w), and the electronic noise associated with the flaw signal, ng(w (Addison et al 1982, CohenTenoudji et al 1984, Clark et al 1985b, Clark et al 1986, Koo 1988). …”
Section: Ill-posednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above f^^^, it is also assumed that the estimate determined in step 1 contains no useful information. In order to force the scattering amplitude estimate to zero at high frequencies, the estimate is multiplied by a cosine-squared window which is centered at zero frequency and decreases to zero at 25% above ^max (Addison et al 1982). The window for the system response shown in 44 Lee (1981) explicitly considered the impulse response estimation problem as an ill-posed problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed to obtain the Born diameter from the characteristic function (3), including dividing the area under the characteristic function by its peak value and multiplying the result by 2, i.e., Area under J(r) 2 Peak Value of J(r) (3) Franz-Gruber Model for Spherical Voids Another way to solve the transducer-selection problem of the BIT for void-like flaws is to insonify the flaw in question with short, high-frequency shear waves and relate the separation of the backscattered satellite pulse [S in Figure 3(b») from the reflected pulse [R in Figure 3(b») to its "approximate dimension" (5). ** Freedman (6) assumed the waveform received from a void-like flaw of convex-shape to be composed of several discrete pulses, each identical to the transmitted pulse.…”
Section: Born Model For Spherical Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it employs the same input data as the 1-D IBA and consequently also shares certain common limitations such as the sensitivity of the sizing results to the zero of time determination and the available bandwidth of the scattering data [3,4]. However, flaw sizing using the zeroes is simpler and more straightforward because the sizes are obtained directly from the frequencies where the zeroes occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. for the special case of a sperhical flaw with radius r, the shape factor reduces to y(q) = 4nr 3 (sinz -zcosz)/z 3 (3) with z = qr. (ki) and scattered (ks) wavevector and the tangent plane d1stance (re).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%