2022
DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEsorter: An accurate and fast method to classify LTR-retrotransposons in plant genomes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to examine the evolutionary dynamics of LTR-RTs that determine rice genome size variation, 8,154 intact LTR-RTs from the twelve Oryza genomes, belonging to AA-, BB-, CC-, FF-, and GG genome types, were detected and classified by TEsorter ( Zhang et al, 2022 ; Figure 3 ). Of them, Ale is the lineage with the most abundant and the longest length of intact LTR RTs of the Copia superfamily among AA, BB, and GG genome types, while the Ivana lineage harbored the most intact LTR-RTs in O. officinalis and O. brachyantha ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to examine the evolutionary dynamics of LTR-RTs that determine rice genome size variation, 8,154 intact LTR-RTs from the twelve Oryza genomes, belonging to AA-, BB-, CC-, FF-, and GG genome types, were detected and classified by TEsorter ( Zhang et al, 2022 ; Figure 3 ). Of them, Ale is the lineage with the most abundant and the longest length of intact LTR RTs of the Copia superfamily among AA, BB, and GG genome types, while the Ivana lineage harbored the most intact LTR-RTs in O. officinalis and O. brachyantha ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All intact LTR-RTs generated by LTR_retriever (version 2.8) ( Ou and Jiang, 2018 ) were classified by TEsorter with default parameters ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). The terminal repeat regions and other non-coding regions are the fastest evolving parts of TEs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, LTR‐TRs are de novo detected using the LTR harvest v.1.6.1 (Ellinghaus et al ., 2008) and LTR finder v.1.07 (Xu & Wang, 2007) programs. To reduce false‐positives, TE sorter v.1.3.0 (Zhang et al ., 2022) is used to reconstruct the classification of LTR‐RTs and further refine this classification. The subgenome‐specific k ‐mer sequences are mapped to the LTR‐RT sequences using a substring match procedure to identify the subgenome‐specific LTR‐RTs by Fisher’s exact test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species‐specific k ‐mers were identified first, then an LTR‐RT library was constructed through scanning the assembled genome by calling LTR harvest (Ellinghaus et al, 2008) and LTR Finder (Xu and Wang, 2007). The clade level of LTR‐RTs was classified by TEsorter (https://github.com/zhangrengang/TEsorter) (Zhang et al, 2022) and the LTR‐RT protein domains (INT, RH and RT domains) were identified and extracted. LTR‐RT protein sequences were aligned with Mafft (Katoh and Standley, 2013) and then merged into one sequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%