2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tertiary phosphine induced migratory carbonyl insertion in cyclopentadienyl complexes of iron(II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yields of 2 in the reactions of 1 with dppe and 1 eq of N∩N are similar (20 vs. 18%, respectively), suggesting that the nature of the entering ligand is not a crucial factor. Such behavior, that is, the promotion of the CO insertion into Fe II –C bonds by phosphines and other ligands, has been reported in the literature …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Yields of 2 in the reactions of 1 with dppe and 1 eq of N∩N are similar (20 vs. 18%, respectively), suggesting that the nature of the entering ligand is not a crucial factor. Such behavior, that is, the promotion of the CO insertion into Fe II –C bonds by phosphines and other ligands, has been reported in the literature …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In general, electron donating ligands in a metal alkyl complex will facilitate the alkyl migration process (through weakening of the metal-C s-bond) whereas electron-withdrawing ligands will strengthen the metalalkyl bond making the process less feasible. 52 Generally, slow alkyl migration will increase the residence time of the alkyl intermediate thereby creating the possibility of reacting with either H 2 or [HCo(CO) 3 P], resulting in hydrogenation of the olefin to form alkanes. 53 Since the correlation between steric and electronic factors do not always display well defined text book correlations with several of the catalytic parameters presented here, it suggests that there may be deviation in the mechanism/catalytic cycle amongst this selection of ligands.…”
Section: Catalytic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C-O bond lengths are between 1.13-1.16 Å (see Table S1), and they decrease in the sequence p-H > p-NH 2 > p-Br, which indicates that an increased contribution of resonance structure due to an increase in the character π-acceptor of the ligand and/or the effect of the electronegativity of p-substituent in benzonitrile molecules causes that the Fe back-bonding into the CO π* orbital is less important and the distance increases [24]. An increase of strong π-acceptor character in benzonitrile molecules, compete with CO molecule for the electron back-donation and the CO stretch frequencies remain high, as also observed by the FTIR stretching frequencies as well [25]. The distances between Fe and the centroids of the π-bonded cyclopentadienyl moiety to Fe centre are: 1.7158 17 Table S1 contains selected bond lengths and angles for all of the compounds.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 78%