1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(98)00016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tertiary extension development and extension/compression interplay in the West Carpathian mountain belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This process took place under transtension/ extension tectonic regime with the principal palaeostress compression oriented in the N -S to NE -SW direction. (Marko et al 1991;Fodor 1995;Marko & Kováč 1996;Nemčok et al 1998;Hók et al 1999). Obtained data indicate successive opening of the depocentres generally from the west to the east (Fig.…”
Section: The Neogene Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process took place under transtension/ extension tectonic regime with the principal palaeostress compression oriented in the N -S to NE -SW direction. (Marko et al 1991;Fodor 1995;Marko & Kováč 1996;Nemčok et al 1998;Hók et al 1999). Obtained data indicate successive opening of the depocentres generally from the west to the east (Fig.…”
Section: The Neogene Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current knowledge (e.g. Ratschbacher et al 1991;Csontos et al 1992;Horváth 1993;Kováč et al 1993;Nemčok et al 1998), among the most significant are: (a) escape of crustal fragments from behind the Alps into the space of the closing flysch basin already during the Paleogene and Neogene, (b) oblique collision of these fragments with the European platform, movement on strike-slip faults, (c) origination of an asthenolith due to finishing subduction, (d) thinning of crust as a result of partial melting and assimilation of lower crust, (e) subsequent extension and subsidence, sedimentation and volcanism finishing with basaltic intrusions due to differentiation of mantle material. The basin basement is very inhomogenous, formed by several crustal tectonic units (Fusán et al 1987;Vozár et al 2010).…”
Section: Tectono-geological Interpretation Of Inversion Results and Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). This block is bounded by the Brenner normal fault, the Periadriatic and the SEMP Lines and represents the hypothesized Miocene (possibly up to present day) 'escape' off to the east of the collapsing, gravitationally unstable, over-thickened Austrian Alps (riding above flowing crystalline basement) as a result of the free margin (within the main alpine collisional system) offered by the Carpathian retreat and/or as a result of the northward indenter push of Adria (Ratschbacher et al 1990(Ratschbacher et al , 1991Fodor et al 1998;Nemcok 1998a;Grenerczy et al 2000;Haas et al 2000;Linzer et al 2002;Sperner et al 2002). Note that the role of the mechanism of indenter Adria's push in to East Alps is sometimes cast as a 'chicken-and-egg' question -as is also sometimes done for Anatolia (i.e.…”
Section: Tectonic Block and Microcontinent Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Holocene landform flank uplift; and even (4) local reactivation of original Alcalpa against Tisza -Dacia thrust (or oblique wrench) displacement systems along the Mid-Hungarian Line) that is evident on exposed basin margins and seismic reflection profiles, and is further revealed by a present day compressive stress regime that is observed in borehole and other in-situ stress data (Peresson & Decker 1997;Csontos & Nagymarosy 1998;Nemcok 1998a;Bada et al 1999;Fodor et al 2005;Plasienka & Kovac 1999;Bertotti et al 2003;Cloetingh et al 2005a, b;Bada et al 2007;Matenco et al 2007). These studies generally interpret the inversion to be due to the compressive stress regime engendered by the final cessation of back-arc extension to the Carpathians that is concomitant with the corresponding halt of the eastward retreat of the Carpathian subduction zone while the Pannonian region is simultaneously exposed to the continued anti-clockwise rotation and north-NE-directed indentation of the Adriatic microplate (push of Adria) against the (Eastern) Alps and the dextral 'transpressional' inner Dinaride zone (Fig.…”
Section: Basin Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%