2012
DOI: 10.1080/19361610.2011.604022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrorism: A Philosophical Discourse

Abstract: Nigh on ten years since 9/11 no agreed definition of terrorism exists still. Indeed the original nations of the Coalition of the Willing who previously pursued a 'War on Terror' so vigorously (Australia, Britain and the United States) have come full circle to presently disown entirely the very notion of a 'War on Terror.' A key stumbling point towards definition remains whether terrorism should be classified as an act of crime or of war. The two conceptualisations are philosophically and fundamentally opposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The philosophy of terrorism in all its manifestations is above all philosophy of antihumanism (Orr, 2012). It is based on the efforts of the subject to impose fear and panic on society, as a result -to paralyze the normal functioning of authorities and management.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The philosophy of terrorism in all its manifestations is above all philosophy of antihumanism (Orr, 2012). It is based on the efforts of the subject to impose fear and panic on society, as a result -to paralyze the normal functioning of authorities and management.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three main principles of scientific knowledge of terrorism are defined (Orr, 2012): historicism political-religious determinism.…”
Section: Complex Causationmentioning
confidence: 99%