Territory–network interplay in the co-constitution of the Arctic and ‘to-be’ Arctic states

Abstract

Territory-network interplay in the co-constitution of the Arctic and 'to-be' Arctic states This paper discusses the (re)production of state and supranational regional spaces through speech acts. Emphasis is placed especially on speech acts that 'construct' regions and concurrently (re)position specific states as 'legitimized' actors within supranational space. Relatedly, focus is directed to how such repositioning is linked to territory-network interplay in establishing and contesting power relations in supranational regional institutions. The article discusses first how the region-building process in the Arcticand power relations within the Arctic Councilhas relied on territorial legitimation in which 'Arctic states' are rendered as the key 'Arctic' actors. Then the focus is shifted to how France and Japan, states considered 'non-Arctic', have recently repositioned themselves in relation to the region in order to gain influence. The key conclusion of the analysis is that by engaging with the observer criteria set by the AC, 'non-Arctic' states are redefining themselves in relation to the region, simultaneously (re)producing the Arctic region and non-Arctic states in relation to each other. This paper also argues that in attempting to dismantle some of the territorial criteria on which the established power relations within the AC rely, these states are pursuing the reinstitutionalization of a 'global' Arctic with renegotiated power relations.

The Arctic: The Struggle for Resources and Influence in the Region

“…In addition, based on the norms of international law, the North Pole is not the property of a designated state. In particular, only the USA, Canada, Russia, Norway and Denmark have an exclusive economic zone that includes 200 nautical miles and is adjacent to their coasts (Väätänen and Zimmerbauer, 2020). Having analyzed the legal status of the Arctic, it was established that it is formed on the basis of the norms of international law, namely international treaties, as well as the norms of the national legislation of the Arctic states.…”

Tall Tales from the High North: Contested Discourses of the Arctic as a Political Space

“…Such an emphasis on different, interacting conceptions from a range of actors has drawn some attention in relatively recent research (Knecht and Keil 2013;Auerswald 2020;Heininen et al 2020;Steinberg, Tasch, and Gerhardt 2015;Väätänen and Zimmerbauer 2020). Knecht and Keil's study on foreign policy discourses of the Arctic finds that socially constructed geographies emerge from how actors imagine and produce a space that differs from that found in sovereign states (2013,.…”

Anticipatory state identity: Understanding the Finnish state's approach to the Arctic

“…Finland is not alone in projecting such a shifting state identity, however. Other states, such as the United States, Canada, Norway, Iceland, and even a few with no territory beyond the Arctic Circle, for instance, China, Japan, and France, have put considerable efforts into developing an Arctic identity for themselves (Bennett, 2015; Dodds & Ingimundarson, 2012; Medby, 2018; Nilsson 2018; Sebastian, 2013; Skripnikova & Raspotnik, 2019; Väätänen & Zimmerbauer, 2020).…”