2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Territorial olive frogs display lower aggression towards neighbours than strangers based on individual vocal signatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adds to a growing number of studies in frogs (reviewed in Bee 2016; Bee et al 2016) and other animals (reviewed in Temeles 1994) demonstrating variation in neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect among territorial species. Vocally-mediated neighbor recognition has been demonstrated in two frog species in the family Ranidae (Davis 1987;Bee and Gerhardt 2002;Chuang et al 2017), but studies of some other distantly related frog species, including other poison frogs (Bee 2003;Tumulty et al 2018), have failed to find robust evidence that territory holders recognize neighbors and behaviorally discriminate between the calls of neighbors and strangers (Bee 2016;Bee et al 2016). The difference in neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect between closely related species shown here highlights that this behavior is evolutionarily labile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study adds to a growing number of studies in frogs (reviewed in Bee 2016; Bee et al 2016) and other animals (reviewed in Temeles 1994) demonstrating variation in neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect among territorial species. Vocally-mediated neighbor recognition has been demonstrated in two frog species in the family Ranidae (Davis 1987;Bee and Gerhardt 2002;Chuang et al 2017), but studies of some other distantly related frog species, including other poison frogs (Bee 2003;Tumulty et al 2018), have failed to find robust evidence that territory holders recognize neighbors and behaviorally discriminate between the calls of neighbors and strangers (Bee 2016;Bee et al 2016). The difference in neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect between closely related species shown here highlights that this behavior is evolutionarily labile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This is because even though Kai rocket frogs share territory boundaries with neighbors for shorter durations than golden rocket frogs, they still defend territories for at least several weeks, which is should provide ample opportunity for males to learn their neighbors' calls. For example, male bullfrogs (Howard 1978) and olive frogs (Chuang et al 2013) also defend territories for several weeks during the breeding season, and both of these species exhibit neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect (Davis 1987;Chuang et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Matheran, usually temperature during the breeding season varies from 22.4 to 24.4°C (a variation of 2°C). Consequently, less fluctuation in the prevailing temperature could be responsible for the lack of correlation between temperature and acoustic properties of N. humayuni as suggested (Chaung et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By virtue of being ectothermic, calling behaviour and acoustic properties of male anurans are affected by environmental factors such as rainfall and temperature (Gerhardt & Huber, ). For instance, fundamental frequency, call rise time, pulse repetition, amplitude and frequency modulation were correlated with temperature (An & Waldman, ; Bee et al, ; Chaung, Kam, & Bee, ). In the present study, however, none of the call properties of N. humayuni was correlated with temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2017), benefiting individuals by providing cooperation partners in agonistic interactions with conspecifics. But reduced aggression, for instance, via dear-enemy effects (Temeles 1994), can likewise be an important benefit of maintaining long-term social bonds, especially in territorial animals (Jaeger 1981; Chuang, Kam & Bee 2017; Siracusa et al . 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%