2011
DOI: 10.2478/s13533-011-0001-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Territorial dynamics and boundary effects in a protected area of the Central Iberian Peninsula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abandonment of traditional land uses in mountain areas during the second half of the twentieth century resulted in the progression of natural vegetation dynamics. Nowadays, seventy years later, can be observed a new forest landscape structure (López 2006;López et al 2010;De las Heras et al 2011;Fernández-Sañudo et al 2007). Goat and sheep herds have disappeared in Guadarrama Range, with the progressive reduction of extensive grazing (Mangas 1981;.…”
Section: Juniper Dynamics In Madrid Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abandonment of traditional land uses in mountain areas during the second half of the twentieth century resulted in the progression of natural vegetation dynamics. Nowadays, seventy years later, can be observed a new forest landscape structure (López 2006;López et al 2010;De las Heras et al 2011;Fernández-Sañudo et al 2007). Goat and sheep herds have disappeared in Guadarrama Range, with the progressive reduction of extensive grazing (Mangas 1981;.…”
Section: Juniper Dynamics In Madrid Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we calculated the percentage of the area that has changed in the whole PNA and for each type of dynamic [28,48]. These percentages allowed us to establish categories of dynamism that distinguished zones of more or less changing and map its spatial distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demography, recreation and urban and transport infrastructures development are the most important pressures in this PNA [28]. This Park was declared a PNA in 1985 abarcando una extensión de casi 53.000 ha [29].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, concerning the third protection level, we consider as UAs those parts of the island that are not included in the first two types and that are outside a five-kilometer buffer around both NPAs and N2Ss to exclude potential boundary effects [32]. Table 1 provides some figures concerning the size of the whole region and of each protection level.…”
Section: Study Area and Protection Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%