Terrific Majesty: The Powers of Shaka Zulu and the Limits of Historical Invention

Nayenga, Peter F. B.; Hamilton, Carolyn

doi:10.2307/494984

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Authorship Expectations Dialogue and Disagreement1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Scholars have explored various aspects of negotiating competing agendas by those involved in the interview, sharing authority, or viewing interview participants as co-authors. They have raised questions about whose focus and interpretation may be privileged, who drives the interview, and who decides what the final product is when those involved disagree (Frisch 1990;Hale 1991;Borland 1991;Brettell 1993;Hamilton 1998;White et al 2001;Gluck 2006;Sfeftel & Zembrzycki 2010). Some researchers have asked: how does access to which resources shape projects throughout their various stages?…”

Section: Authorship Expectations Dialogue and Disagreementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dialoguing with Retired Nurses: Involving Interview Participants in the Interpretation Process in South Africa

Hadfield¹

2023

Afr. Stud. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The African Studies community has reinvigorated discussions about the racial and power dynamics of the field in the past few years. A core question has been how to Africanize knowledge production. Hadfield’s practical example as a white American historian involving Black South African oral history interview participants in different stages of the research process shows that successfully including interview participants in the interpretation stage requires clarity and transparency throughout. If meaningful dialogue is employed and human connections prioritized, the result should be a more accurate and inclusive process that satisfies all, even if scholars and participants disagree.

show abstract

Section: Authorship Expectations Dialogue and Disagreementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dialoguing with Retired Nurses: Involving Interview Participants in the Interpretation Process in South Africa

Hadfield¹

2023

Afr. Stud. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Terrific Majesty: The Powers of Shaka Zulu and the Limits of Historical Invention

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Dialoguing with Retired Nurses: Involving Interview Participants in the Interpretation Process in South Africa

Dialoguing with Retired Nurses: Involving Interview Participants in the Interpretation Process in South Africa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About