2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrestrial plants as a potential temporary sink of atmospheric microplastics during transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al, 2020a;Y. Zhang et al, 2020b), which was significantly higher than MP deposition in an associated outdoor environment (0.7 × 10 3 -1.9 × 10 3 n/m 2 /day) (Liu et al, 2020). Many factors are posited to explain the spatial variation of indoor airborne MPs, such as the materials comprising clothing, bedding, carpets and furniture, cleaning mode/frequency and airflow turbulence/filtering caused by human activities and ventilation systems (Dris et al, 2017;Q.…”
Section: Spatial Variation Of Airborne Mps In Different Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang et al, 2020a;Y. Zhang et al, 2020b), which was significantly higher than MP deposition in an associated outdoor environment (0.7 × 10 3 -1.9 × 10 3 n/m 2 /day) (Liu et al, 2020). Many factors are posited to explain the spatial variation of indoor airborne MPs, such as the materials comprising clothing, bedding, carpets and furniture, cleaning mode/frequency and airflow turbulence/filtering caused by human activities and ventilation systems (Dris et al, 2017;Q.…”
Section: Spatial Variation Of Airborne Mps In Different Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to MPs from textile products, MPs originating from weathering and fragmentation of plastic products, such as plastic bags, packaging materials and bottles, contribute to contrasting polymer composition of the airborne MPs in outdoor environments (Cai et al, 2017;Zeng, 2018). As a result, MPs reported in outdoor atmospheric deposition have a greater diversity of sizes, shapes and polymer composition (Liu et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2020). The predominance of PE, PS and PET in the outdoor airborne MPs of Wenzhou differs considerably in composition to indoor MPs, implying the origin of MPs in the outdoor atmosphere may be closer to the typical plastic debris littering the urban environment.…”
Section: Spatial Variation Of Airborne Mps In Different Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acrylate copolymers; i.e., ethylene/ethyl acrylate copolymer and poly (t-butyl acrylate) (Fig. 5d) were also identi ed, previously reported by Liu et al (2020) in atmospheric microplastics deposited on terrestrial plants, and used in commercial shower gels, peelings, waterproof sunscreen or as a gallant for lipstick (Liebezeit and Dubaish 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In the last two decades, both microplastics (MPs, 1 µm to 5 mm) and nanoplastic (NPs, <1 µm) in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems have attracted widespread attention all over the world 3,4,5,6 . Compared with the welldocumented reports of plastic debris in aquatic ecosystems, there is a marked lack of knowledge about the impact of MPs/NPs on terrestrial ecosystems (especially agroecosystems), which has become a eld of interest for scientists 3, 7, 8 . As reported, MPs/NPs can enter the agricultural environment through sewage irrigation 9,10,11 , sludge and fertilizer application 12,13,14 , plastic-lm mulch degradation 15,16 , and even atmospheric deposition 17,18 . Consequently, the mass input loadings of plastic debris in agroecosystems have led to the frequent occurrence of MPs/NPs in agricultural soil like arable soil of southwestern China 19 , Swiss oodplain soils 20 , and farmland of southeast Germany 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%