2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40658-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrestrial Laser Scanning in the Age of Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…annual instrument calibration, warranty extension, import/export documentation, etc.) and personnel costs associated with the lengthy TLS post-processing phase are factored in [19]. A potential solution for utilizing the proposed methods to monitor large sites with limited resources is to adopt alternative surveying technologies, such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and digital photogrammetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…annual instrument calibration, warranty extension, import/export documentation, etc.) and personnel costs associated with the lengthy TLS post-processing phase are factored in [19]. A potential solution for utilizing the proposed methods to monitor large sites with limited resources is to adopt alternative surveying technologies, such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and digital photogrammetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although archaeologists have employed TLS extensively for stratigraphic and site-wide infield documentation, site monitoring, and damage assessment [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], conservators have employed this technique less frequently to monitor and preserve ancient earthen architecture [15][16][17][18]. Despite the high ownership and maintenance costs associated with TLS [19] and the availability of alternative intra-site digital documentation technology [20], laser scanning is still the most feasible option for intra-site documentation of large and complex sites such as Çatalhöyük.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2010's, additional research on digital archaeological methods at Çatalhöyük contributed to emphasize the epistemic value of visualization in archaeology by integrating 3D modeling, digital documentation, and virtual simulation in the daily activities of the excavators (Forte et al, 2012). More precisely, between 2010 and 2015, a multidisciplinary team of archaeologists and heritage specialists from the University of California Merced, Duke University, and Lund University digitally recorded the 3D topology of each stratigraphic layers of Building 89 in the framework of the 3D Digging at Çatalhöyük Project (3D Digging) led by Maurizio Forte (Lercari, 2016a). The goal of this initiative was to define novel methods for the interpretation of the archaeological record using interactive visual-analytical tools, such as the ones available in the 3D Geographic Information System (GIS) platform ESRI ArcScene, or the in the custom virtual reality software for archaeology Dig@IT developed at Duke University (Forte et al, 2015).…”
Section: Virtual Simulation As a Reflexive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a model can of course be constructed manually, efficient measurement can be utilized for reality-based modeling [5]. Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) provide dense and accurate geometric information, though they are expensive [6], require the careful planning of scan locations, and can be time-consuming to use [7]. In recent years, an increasing number of low-cost sensor systems for 3D modeling using different operating systems have entered the market [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%