2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terrestrial Laser Scanning-Based Structural Damage Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
130
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we describe the protocol for scan alignment applied to the nearcontinuous dataset. As discussed by Abellán et al (2014), aligning point clouds can be undertaken using common surveyed and modelled targets combined with measured global coordinates (Teza et al, 2007;Olsen et al, 2009), featurebased registration based on the planarity and curvature of surfaces (e.g. Besl and Jain, 1988;Belton and Lichti, 2006;Rabbani et al, 2006), and point-to-point and point-to-surface methods, which use iterative closest point (ICP) alignment to progressively reduce the distance between two clouds (Besl and McKay, 1992;Chen and Medioni, 1992;Zhang, 1994).…”
Section: Precise Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we describe the protocol for scan alignment applied to the nearcontinuous dataset. As discussed by Abellán et al (2014), aligning point clouds can be undertaken using common surveyed and modelled targets combined with measured global coordinates (Teza et al, 2007;Olsen et al, 2009), featurebased registration based on the planarity and curvature of surfaces (e.g. Besl and Jain, 1988;Belton and Lichti, 2006;Rabbani et al, 2006), and point-to-point and point-to-surface methods, which use iterative closest point (ICP) alignment to progressively reduce the distance between two clouds (Besl and McKay, 1992;Chen and Medioni, 1992;Zhang, 1994).…”
Section: Precise Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It creates mesh or triangulated models of the reference point cloud, which are used to measure the orthogonal distances for each point in the compared cloud (Cignoni and Rocchini 1998, see also Monserrat andCrosetto 2008 andOlsen et al 2010 for recent reviews). This procedure is most suited with sub-planar objects, due to a tendency to smooth out details possibly relevant in local properties evaluation.…”
Section: Point Clouds Comparison Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gridded data sets can be compared to produce a DEM of difference (DoD), which highlights areas of loss or accumulation [10,15,[23][24][25][26]. Other methods include C2M, where surface models are created from point cloud data sets via meshing or triangulation and compared with subsequently gathered point data sets (e.g., Abellán et al [17]; Abellán et al [18]; and Olsen et al [27]). However, isolating regions of interest and creating DEMs or surface models is time-consuming and requires interpolation [22].…”
Section: Change Detection Via Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C2M Analyses C2M comparisons have been used by many workers to detect a change between sequentially gathered point clouds [17,18,27]. Consider two sequential point clouds of the same feature, C b and C a (Figure 1(A)).…”
Section: Change Detection Via Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%